On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Sage Weil <s...@inktank.com> wrote: > I typed up what I think is remaining for the cache tier work for firefly. > Greg, can you take a look? I'm most likely missing a bunch of stuff here. > > > http://wiki.ceph.com/01Planning/02Blueprints/Emperor/rados_cache_pool_(part_2) > > This will be one of the meatier sessions at the upcoming CDS. There will > be a fair bit of work not just on the OSD side but also in building > testing tools that exercise and validate the functionality, here, that > may be a great way for a new contributer to get involved and help out.
This looks reasonably complete to me as an enumeration of areas, but is definitely targeted at the cache pool use case rather than demoting to cold storage. I'm not sure yet if we're going to want to use the same agent/process/whatever in both use cases; do you want a separate blueprint for that, or should we broaden this one? -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
