On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Alexandre Oliva <ol...@gnu.org> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2013, Gregory Farnum <g...@inktank.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Alexandre Oliva <ol...@gnu.org> wrote:
>>> Here's an updated version of the patch, that makes it much faster than
>>> the earlier version, particularly when the gap between the latest osdmap
>>> known by the osd and the earliest osdmap known by the cluster is large.
>
>> Is this actually still necessary in the latest dumpling and emperor
>> branches?
>
> I can't tell for sure, I don't recall when I last rolled back to an old
> snapshot without this kind of patch.
>
>> I thought sufficiently-old OSDs would go through backfill with the new
>> PG members in order to get up-to-date without copying all the data.
>
> That much is true, for sure.  The problem was getting to that point.
>
> If the latest osdmap known by the osd snapshot turns out to be older
> than the earliest map known by the monitors, the osd would give up
> because it couldn't make the ends meet: no incremental osdmaps were
> available in the cluster, and the osd refused to jump over gaps in the
> osdmap sequence.  That's why I fudged the unavailable intermediate
> osdmaps as clones of the latest one known by the osd: then it would
> apply the incremental changes as nops until it got to an actual newer
> map, in which it would notice a number of changes, apply them all, and
> get on its happy way towards recovery over each of the newer osdmaps ;-)
>
> I can give a try without the patch if you tell me there's any chance the
> osd might now be able to jump over gaps in the osdmap sequence.  That
> said, the posted patch, ugly as it is, is meant as a stopgap rather than
> as a proper solution; dealing with osdmap gaps rather than dying would
> be surely a more desirable implementation.

I don't remember exactly when it got changed, but I think so. Right Sam?
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to