On 09/11/2014 11:17 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Alex Elder <el...@ieee.org> wrote:
>> On 09/11/2014 10:10 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>>> Trying to map an image out of a pool for which we don't have an 'x'
>>> permission bit fails with -ERANGE from ceph_extract_encoded_string()
>>> due to an unsigned vs signed bug. Fix it and get rid of the -ENIVAL
>>> sink, thus exposing rbd::get_id cls method return value. (I've seen
>>> a bunch of unexplained -ERANGE reports, I bet this is it).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryo...@inktank.com>
>>
>> I often think people are annoyed by my explicit type casts
>> all over the place. This (missed) one matters a lot.
>>
>> I think the -EINVAL was to ensure an error code that was
>> expected by a write() call would be returned.
>
> Yeah, the way it's written it's possible in theory to get a positive
> return value from rbd_dev_image_id(). Looking deeper, this sizeof() is
> not needed at all - ceph_extract_encoded_string() deals with short
> buffers as it should. As for the ret == sizeof(u32) (i.e. an empty
> string), neither userspace nor us check against empty strings in
> similar cases (object prefix, snapshot name, etc).
I should have asked this before. Why is a permission error
leading to ceph_extract_encoded_string() finding a short
buffer? I didn't take the time to trace the error path
you're talking about here all the way back.
(I'm looking at your new patch in the mean time.)
-Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
