> On 19 Sep 2014, at 08:12, Florian Haas <flor...@hastexo.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Sage Weil <sw...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
>>> Hi Sage,
>>>
>>> was the off-list reply intentional?
>>
>> Whoops! Nope :)
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Sage Weil <sw...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> So, disaster is a pretty good description. Would anyone from the core
>>>>> team like to suggest another course of action or workaround, or are
>>>>> Dan and I generally on the right track to make the best out of a
>>>>> pretty bad situation?
>>>>
>>>> The short term fix would probably be to just prevent backfill for the time
>>>> being until the bug is fixed.
>>>
>>> As in, osd max backfills = 0?
>>
>> Yeah :)
>>
>> Just managed to reproduce the problem...
>>
>> sage
>
> Saw the wip branch. Color me freakishly impressed on the turnaround. :)
> Thanks!
Indeed :) Thanks Sage!
wip-9487-dumpling fixes the problem on my test cluster. Trying in prod now…
Cheers,
DanN�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�]z���{ay� ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z� �w���
���j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
