Hi Sage, sorry to be late to this thread; I just caught this one as I was reviewing the Giant release notes. A few questions below:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Sage Weil <s...@newdream.net> wrote: > [...] > * ACLs: implemented, tested for kernel client. not implemented for > ceph-fuse. > [...] > * samba VFS integration: implemented, limited test coverage. ACLs are kind of a must-have feature for most Samba admins. The Samba Ceph VFS builds on userspace libcephfs directly, neither the kernel client nor ceph-fuse, so I'm trying to understand whether ACLs are available to Samba users or not. Can you clarify please? > * ganesha NFS integration: implemented, no test coverage. I understood from a conversation I had with John in London that flock() and fcntl() support had recently been added to ceph-fuse, can this be expected to Just Work⢠in Ganesha as well? Also, can you make a general statement as to the stability of flock() and fcntl() support in the kernel client and in libcephfs/ceph-fuse? This too is particularly interesting for Samba admins who rely on byte-range locking for Samba CTDB support. > * kernel NFS reexport: implemented. limited test coverage. no known > issues. In this scenario, is there any specific magic that the kernel client does to avoid producing deadlocks under memory pressure? Or are you referring to FUSE-mounted CephFS reexported via kernel NFS? Cheers, Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
