Giulio, Right. The volume part is tricky because the volume is ultimately tied to one cinder-volume instance. I don't have a magic solution for that yet.
I'm not going to the contributor summit unfortunately. I'm not personally a fan of keepalived since I've been spoiled by corosync. Let's see if we can chat about this later. -- David Moreau Simard > On Nov 7, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Giulio Fidente <gfide...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 11/07/2014 09:46 AM, David Moreau Simard wrote: >> Loic, >> >> Was there an etherpad ? I'm curious as I didn't attend that one. >> >> HA with Cinder mostly revolves around setting up multiple cinder-api and >> cinder-volume servers. Was there something else involved ? >> I can probably contribute my knowledge on that.. > > hi David, > > indeed it would be great if we could get in touch! I'm still at the summit, > in the TripleO room, in case you are around too. > > So yes there is an etherpad and also a TripleO spec which goes a bit more > into the details (linked from the etherpad): > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-kilo-l3-and-cinder-ha > > The architecture we're considering is as follows: > > keepalived > haproxy > ceph-mon > > where haproxy and ceph-mon are always up on all openstack 'controller' nodes > (also running cinder) and keepalived is taking care of managing a virtual ip > hosted on one of those > -- > Giulio Fidente > GPG KEY: 08D733BA | IRC: giulivo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
