On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 09:33:57AM -0800, Sage Weil wrote: > By the way I took another look and I'm not sure that it is worth > duplicating all of the tree logic for a tree view. It seems easier to > either include this optionally in the tree output (the utilzation calc is > simpler than the tree traversal stack)... or generalize it somehow?
Note, we already have duplication, at least CrushWrapper::dump_tree() and OSDMap::print_tree(). I will work on generalization, I think some tree dumper in CrushWrapper. -- Mykola Golub -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
