On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Josh Durgin <josh.dur...@inktank.com> wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 06:26 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> While looking at errors from a giant (plus backports) run of the RBD
>> suite, I stumbled upon:
>>
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10513
>>
>> and the error is unclear (at least to me ;-). Would you have an idea ? For
>> information the backports included are all the pull requests mentionned at
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501.
>
>
> Thanks for organizing these Loic!
>
> There's no trace of the actual error in the teuthology or ceph client
> logs. Looking at the syslogs, this and several other failures from that
> run were from running out of memory. This happened with and without
> caching, so I suspect these tests may simply need more memory in their
> current configuration, since osds are sharing it too, and they use much
> more with thrashing.
Speaking of fsx and thrasher. Last time I tried fsx (both kernel and
librbd) couldn't survive thrashing due to watch/notify troubles. Are
all the new watch/notify pieces that were supposed to fix this in?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
