Yeah, the rados run had too much environmental noise to be useful.
-Sam

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Yuri Weinstein <ywein...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I linked all issues related to this release testing to the ticket 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560
>
> After the team leads make a call of those, including environment issues, I 
> suggest re-running suites the failed again.
>
> Loic, I'd re-run them in the Octo, since we already started there, if you 
> agree ?
>
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yuri Weinstein" <ywein...@redhat.com>
> To: "Loic Dachary" <l...@dachary.org>
> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Sage Weil" 
> <s...@redhat.com>, "Tamil Muthamizhan" <tmuth...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 2:24:33 PM
> Subject: Re: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE
>
> I replied to individual suites runs, but just wanted to summarize QE 
> validation status.
>
> The following suites were executed in the Octo lab (we will use Sepia in the 
> future if nobody objects).
>
> upgrade:dumpling
> ================
> ['45493']
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10694 - Known "Won't fix"
> "Assertion: osd/Watch.cc: 290: FAILED assert(!cb)"
>
> *** Sam - pls confirm the "Won't fix" status.
>
> ['45495', '45496', '45498', '45499', '45500']
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10838
> "s3tests failed"
>
> *** Yehuda - need your verdict on s3tests.
>
> fs
> ================
> All green !
>
> rados
> ================
> ['45054']
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10841
> "Issued certificate has expired"
> *** Sandon pls comment.
>
> ['45168', '45169']
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10840
> coredump "ceph_test_filestore_idempotent_sequence"
> *** Sam - pls comment
>
> ['45215']
> Missing packages - no ticket FYI
> "Failed to fetch 
> http://apt-mirror.front.sepia.ceph.com/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages
>   Hash Sum mismatch"
>
> *** Zack, Sandon ?
>
> ceph-deploy
> ================
>
> Travis - pls suggest
> In general I am not sure if we needed to test this - Sage?
>
> rbd
> ================
> ['45365', '45366', '45367']
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10842
> "unable to connect to apt-mirror.front.sepia.ceph.com"
>
> ['45349', '45350', '45351', '45355', '45356', '45357', '45363']
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10802
> "error: image still has watchers"
> (duplicate of 10680)
>
> *** Zack, Sandon, Josh - all environment noise, pls comment.
>
> rgw
> ================
> ['45382', '45390']
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10843
> "s3tests failed" - could be related or duplicate of 10838
>
> *** Yehuda - same as issues in upgrades?
>
> I am standing by for you analysis/replies and recommendations for next steps.
>
> Loic - let me know is you want to follow specific items in our backport 
> testing process that I missed here.
> PS:  I would think that you could've wanted to assign the release ticket to 
> QE (me) for validation and at this point I could've re-assigned it back to 
> devel (you), a?
>
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Loic Dachary" <l...@dachary.org>
> To: "Yuri Weinstein" <ywein...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:05:31 AM
> Subject: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE
>
> Hi Yuri,
>
> The dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 as found at 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports has been approved by 
> Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is ready for QE.
>
> For the record, the head is 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410
>
> I think it would be best for the QE tests to use the dumpling-backports. The 
> alternative would be to merge dumpling-backports into dumpling. However, 
> since testing may take a long time and require more patches, it probably is 
> better to not do that iterative process on the dumpling branch itself. As it 
> is now, there already are a number of commits in the dumpling branch that 
> should really be in the dumpling-backports: they do not belong to v0.67.11 
> and are going to be released in v0.67.12. In the future though, the dumpling 
> branch will only receive commits that have been carefully tested and all the 
> integration work will be on the dumpling-backports branch exclusively. So 
> that third parties do not have to worry that the dumpling branch contains 
> commits that have not been tested yet.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to