> -----Original Message----- > From: Danny Al-Gaaf [mailto:danny.al-g...@bisect.de] > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 3:46 PM > To: Mark Nelson; Deneau, Tom; ceph-devel > Subject: Re: packages on download.ceph.com > > Am 09.03.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Mark Nelson: > > > > > > On 03/09/2015 02:06 PM, Deneau, Tom wrote: > >> I'm trying to gather information on what it would take to get packages > >> for an architecture other than x86_64 up on http://download.ceph.com > > > > What we've done in the past for certain non-X86 architectures (such as > > ARM) is to get build nodes in place that can be used with our gitbuilder > > setup to continuously make development builds: > > > > http://www.ceph.com/gitbuilder.cgi > > > > Which get put here: > > > > http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/ > > > > Usually the problem is two fold: Someone's time to set it up, and > > making sure we have enough (or fast enough) build systems for that > > architecture to keep up. > > It would be much easier to use OpenBuildService [1] for package build. > It supports many distributions and architectures. > > If you don't care that it's openSUSE infrastructure you/we could use > build.opensuse.org to build packages e.g. for RHEL/Centos/Fedora, > openSUSE/SLES, Debian, Ubuntu and others (I did so in the past.) > > At least openSUSE/SLES packages could be also build on armv7l and e.g. > ppc/s390x ... for other distros we have to check. > > The question is: should we build packages (and which) or is this more a > task for the distributions? > > Danny > > [1] http://openbuildservice.org > [2] https://build.opensuse.org
Building packages should indeed be a task for the distributions but some distros are slow to add new packages so this would be a stopgap measure until they do. -- Tom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
