On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Alfredo Deza <ad...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <ski...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> When I ran: >> >> $ sudo ./ceph-deploy --username ceph install ceph01 >> >> I ended up with: >> >> [ceph_deploy][ERROR ] RuntimeError: connecting to host: ceph@ceph01 >> resulted in errors: HostNotFound ceph@ceph01 > > This is a problem from the underlying library that ceph-deploy uses that treats the inability to connect to a host as a "HostNotFound" error which may not be correct.
I opened an issue to follow up on this: https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/execnet/issues/48/hostnotfound-is-raised-when-ssh-reports-a But in the meantime, I think that ceph-deploy could report that it couldn't connect and suggest that the user should try to SSH directly to the host. Would that be an acceptable report? (given that we don't have access to what SSH returned as the error message) > >> >> >> That's fine. I need to do something. >> But actual reason of failure was: >> >> Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-keyex,gssapi-with-mic). >> >> I think we should change such an ambiguous [ERROR ] message >> to more reasonable one so that nobody doesn't confuse any >> hostname configuration? >> >> Thought? >> >> - >> $ ./ceph-deploy --version >> 1.5.27 >> >> Shinobu >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
