On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 00:53, Martin Verges <martin.ver...@croit.io> wrote: > Swap is nothing you want to have in a Server as it is very slow and can cause > long downtimes.
Given the commentary on this page advocating at least some swap to enable Linux to manage memory when under pressure: https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/unix/NoSwapConsequence is it worth modifying the advice to at least have some swap available (even if only say 5% of overall memory)? There was a hnews thread here but to me it seemed inconclusive about solving the overall problem (other than applications taking more responsibility for memory consumption): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20641551 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
