Hi, After reading few sources, I decided to use dedicated NVMe Disk with native replication. Those benchmarks and performances I was referred for internal use only. Not much data stored there. I believe for production usages, it will deliver more trouble than advantages.
Thanks, Gencer. On 17.10.2020 18:39:44, Gencer W. Genç <gen...@gencgiyen.com> wrote: Hi Irek, In the past I see some good results (benchmark & latencies) for MySQL and PostgreSQL. However, I've always used 4MB object size. Maybe i can get much better performance on smaller object size. Haven't tried actually. Why are you not recommending this setup actually? Gencer. On 17.10.2020 18:01:19, Irek Fasikhov <malm...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, Ceph for a transaction database bad solution from medium loads. сб, 17 окт. 2020 г. в 16:29, Gencer W. Genç <gen...@gencgiyen.com [mailto:gen...@gencgiyen.com]>: Hi, I have an existing few RBDs. I would like to create a new RBD Image for PostgreSQL. Do you have any suggestions for such use cases? For example; Currently defaults are: Object size (4MB) and Stripe Unit (None) Features: Deep flatten + Layering + Exclusive Lock + Object Map + FastDiff Should I use as is or should I use 16KB of object size and different sets of features for PostgreSQL? Thanks, Gencer. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io [mailto:ceph-users@ceph.io] To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io [mailto:ceph-users-le...@ceph.io] _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
