By the way, since there’s some probability that this is a GC refcount issue, would it be possible and sane to somehow slow the GC down or disable it altogether? Is that something we could implement on our end as a stop-gap measure to prevent dataloss?
> On 18 Nov 2020, at 10:46, Denis Krienbühl <de...@href.ch> wrote: > > I can now confirm that last night’s missing object was a multi-part file. > >> On 18 Nov 2020, at 10:01, Janek Bevendorff <janek.bevendo...@uni-weimar.de> >> wrote: >> >> Sorry, it's radosgw-admin object stat --bucket=BUCKETNAME >> --object=OBJECTNAME (forgot the "object" there) >> >> On 18/11/2020 09:58, Janek Bevendorff wrote: >>>> >>>> The object, a Docker layer, that went missing has not been touched in 2 >>>> months. It worked for a while, but then suddenly went missing. >>> Was the object a multipart object? You can check by running radosgw-admin >>> stat --bucket=BUCKETNAME --object=OBJECTNAME. It should say something "ns": >>> "multipart" in the output. If it says "ns": "shadow", it's a single-part >>> object. >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
