This also sounds like a possible GlusterFS use case. Regards, -Jamie
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Burkhard Linke < burkhard.li...@computational.bio.uni-giessen.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 15.06.21 16:15, Christoph Brüning wrote: > > Hi, > > > > That's right! > > > > We're currently evaluating a similar setup with two identical HW nodes > > (on two different sites), with OSD, MON and MDS each, and both nodes > > have CephFS mounted. > > > > The goal is to build a minimal self-contained shared filesystem that > > remains online during planned updates and can somehow survive should > > disaster strike at one of the two sites. > > > This sounds like a use case for DRBD, maybe with OCFS2 on top as > cluster(ed) filesystem. Ceph is overkill, and not really suited for two > hosts setups. > > > Regards, > > Burkhard > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > -- Jamie Fargen Senior Consultant jfar...@redhat.com 813-817-4430 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
