> Hi,
> 
> as far as I understand it,
> 
> you get no real benefit with doing them one by one, as each osd add, can 
> cause a lot of data to be moved to a different osd, even tho you just 
> rebalanced it.

Less than with older releases, but yeah.  

I’ve known someone who advised against doing them in parallel because one would 
— for a time — have PGs with multiple remaps in the acting set.  The objection 
may have been paranoia, I’m not sure.

One compromise is to upweight the new OSDs one node at a time, so the churn is 
limited to one failure domain at a time.

— aad
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

Reply via email to