On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 7:54 AM Frank Schilder <fr...@dtu.dk> wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > I know that "fs fail ..." is not ideal, but we will not have time for a clean > "fs down true" and wait for journal flush procedure to complete (on our > cluster this takes at least 20 minutes, which is way too long). My question > is more along the lines 'Is an "fs fail" destructive?'
It is not but lingering clients will not be evicted automatically by the MDS. If you can, unmount before doing `fs fail`. A journal flush is not really necessary. You only should wait ~10 seconds after the last client unmounts to give the MDS time to write out to its journal any outstanding events. > , that is, will an FS come up again after > > - fs fail > ... > - fs set <fs_name> joinable true Yes. -- Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D. He / Him / His Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
