Hi,
first of all, if you really need to issue ceph-volume manually,
there's a batch command:
cephadm ceph-volume lvm batch /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde
Second, are you using cephadm? Maybe your manual intervention
conflicts with the automatic osd setup (all available devices). You
could look into /var/log/ceph/cephadm.log on each node and see if
cephadm already tried to setup the OSDs for you. What does 'ceph orch
ls' show?
Did you end up having online OSDs or did it fail? In that case I would
purge all OSDs from the crushmap, then wipe all devices (ceph-volume
lvm zap --destroy /dev/sdX) and either let cephadm create the OSDs for
you or you disable that (unmanaged=true) and run the manual steps
again (although it's not really necessary).
Regards,
Eugen
Zitat von Oleksiy Stashok <oleks...@google.com>:
Hey guys,
I ran into a weird issue, hope you can explain what I'm observing. I'm
testing* Ceph 16.2.10* on *Ubuntu 20.04* in *Google Cloud VMs*, I created 3
instances and attached 4 persistent SSD disks to each instance. I can see
these disks attached as `/dev/sdb, /dev/sdc, /dev/sdd, /dev/sde` devices.
As a next step I used ceph-ansible to bootstrap the ceph cluster on 3
instances, however I intentionally skipped OSD setup. So I ended up with a
Ceph cluster w/o any OSD.
I ssh'ed into each VM and ran:
```
sudo -s
for dev in sdb sdc sdd sde; do
/usr/sbin/ceph-volume --cluster ceph lvm create --bluestore
--dmcrypt --data "/dev/$dev"
done
```
The operation above randomly fails on random instances/devices with
something like:
```
bluefs _replay 0x0: stop: uuid e2f72ec9-2747-82d7-c7f8-41b7b6d41e1b !=
super.uuid 0110ddb3-d4bf-4c1e-be11-654598c71db0
```
The interesting this is that when I do
```
/usr/sbin/ceph-volume lvm ls
```
I can see that the device for which OSD creation failed actually belongs to
a different OSD that was previously created for a different device. For
example the failure I mentioned above happened on the `/dev/sde` device, so
when I list lvms I see this:
```
====== osd.2 =======
[block]
/dev/ceph-103a4373-dbe0-43d6-a9e0-34db4e1b257c/osd-block-9af542ba-fd65-4355-ad17-7293856acaeb
block device
/dev/ceph-103a4373-dbe0-43d6-a9e0-34db4e1b257c/osd-block-9af542ba-fd65-4355-ad17-7293856acaeb
block uuid FfFnLt-h33F-F73V-tY45-VuZM-scj7-C3dg1K
cephx lockbox secret AQAlelljqNPoMhAA59JwN3wGt0d6Si+nsnxsRQ==
cluster fsid 348fff8e-e850-4774-9694-05d5414b1c53
cluster name ceph
crush device class
encrypted 1
osd fsid 9af542ba-fd65-4355-ad17-7293856acaeb
osd id 2
osdspec affinity
type block
vdo 0
devices /dev/sdd
[block]
/dev/ceph-df14969f-2dfb-45f1-a579-a8e23ec12e33/osd-block-4686f6fc-8dc1-48fd-a2d9-70a281c8ee64
block device
/dev/ceph-df14969f-2dfb-45f1-a579-a8e23ec12e33/osd-block-4686f6fc-8dc1-48fd-a2d9-70a281c8ee64
block uuid GEajK3-Tsyf-XZS9-E5ik-M1BB-VIpb-q7D1ET
cephx lockbox secret AQAwelljFw2nJBAApuMs2WE0TT+7c1TGa4xQzg==
cluster fsid 348fff8e-e850-4774-9694-05d5414b1c53
cluster name ceph
crush device class
encrypted 1
osd fsid 4686f6fc-8dc1-48fd-a2d9-70a281c8ee64
osd id 2
osdspec affinity
type block
vdo 0
devices /dev/sde
```
How did it happen that `/dev/sde/ was claimed by osd.2?
Thank you!
Oleksiy
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io