I'm hoping to see at least one more, if not more than that, but I have no 
crystal ball. I definitely support this idea, and strongly suggest it's given 
some thought. There have been a lot of delays/missed releases due to all of the 
lab issues, and it's significantly impacted the release cadence for quite some 
time.

We've got a fair number of patches we intend for backport to Pacific that 
address core functionality issues impacting our customer workloads, but haven't 
been able to get released due to all of the infrastructure problems.

David

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, at 05:27, Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On 17 Jul 2023, at 12:53, Ponnuvel Palaniyappan <pponnu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The typical EOL date (2023-06-01) has already passed for Pacific. Just
>> wondering if there's going to be another Pacific point release (16.2.14) in
>> the pipeline.
>
> Good point! At least, for possibility upgrade RBD clusters from 
> Nautilus to Pacific, seems this release should get this backport [1]
>
> Also, it will be good to see an update of information on distributions 
> (ABC QA grades) [2]
>
> Thanks,
>
> [1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59538
> [2] https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/start/os-recommendations/#platforms
>
> k
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

Reply via email to