Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In most cases the 'Alternative' distro like Alma or Rocky have outdated
> versions
> of packages, if we compared it with CentOS Stream 8 or CentOS Stream 9. For
> example is a
> golang package, on c8s is a 1.20 version on Alma still 1.19
>
> You can try to use c8s/c9s or try to contribute to your distro to resolve
> dependency
> issues
>
>
> k
By definition, the stable version of anything is going to have "outdated
versions of packages," so that's not really what's going on here.
You did, unintentionally, give me the clue I needed, though. I accessed the
Ceph repos from Rocky's Extras repo, which includes centos-release-ceph-quincy
centos-release-ceph-pacific.noarch 1.0-2.el9
CEC_Rocky_Linux_9_Rocky_92_extras
centos-release-ceph-quincy.noarch 1.0-2.el9
CEC_Rocky_Linux_9_Rocky_92_extras
centos-release-cloud.noarch 1-1.el9
CEC_Rocky_Linux_9_Rocky_92_extras
Which is pointing to 9-stream. (I do remember seeing "9s" in the repo names,
but I didn't connect it with Stream, since I don't do Stream in production and,
honestly, I don't have enough time at work to do Stream in test, so...)
>From /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Ceph-Quincy.repo:
metalink=https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-storage-sig-ceph-quincy-9-stream&arch=$basearch
Which is why I'm getting different dependencies. THAT I can take to the Rocky
folks to get sorted. I can see where that would cause confusion, as it did in
my case. When I originally installed Ceph, I was using RHEL, not Rocky and I
didn't use (or have?) the Extras repo. I copied the repo over and edited it to
point to Ceph Reef EL9, which installed fine -- and confused me further, but
makes sense now since it wasn't for Stream.
I'll roll my own repo files and not use the centos-release-ceph-* from Extras.
Hopefully, this saves someone else a bit of grief later!
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
