Hi everyone, I just like to know what's your opinion about the reliability of erasure coding.
Of course I can understand if we want the «best of the best of the best» ;-) I can choose the replica method. I heard in many location “replica” are more reliable, “replica” are more efficient etc... Yes...well since 25 years I'm using raid (5, 6, lvm, raidz1, raidz2, etc.) I never loose data only once when a firmware bug in some xxxxx card crash the raid volume. Now 25 years later lot of people recommend to use replica so if I buy XTo I'm only going to have X/3 To (vs raidz2 where I loose 2 disks over 9-12 disks). So my question are : Anyone use in large scale erasure coding for critical (same level as raidz1/raid5 ou raidz2/raid6) ? Regards -- Albert SHIH 🦫 🐸 Observatoire de Paris France Heure locale/Local time: jeu. 23 nov. 2023 14:51:28 CET _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
