Thank you Frank. My focus is actually performance tuning. After your mail, I started to investigate client-side.
I think the kernel tunings work great now. After the tunings I didn't get any warning again. Now I will continue with performance tunings. I decided to distribute subvolumes across multiple pools instead of multi-active-mds. With this method I will have multiple MDS and [1x cephfs clients for each pool / Host] To hide subvolume uuids, I'm using "mount --bind kernel links" and I wonder is it able to create performance issues on cephfs clients? Best regards. Frank Schilder <fr...@dtu.dk>, 27 Oca 2024 Cmt, 12:34 tarihinde şunu yazdı: > Hi Özkan, > > > ... The client is actually at idle mode and there is no reason to fail > at all. ... > > if you re-read my message, you will notice that I wrote that > > - its not the client failing, its a false positive error flag that > - is not cleared for idle clients. > > You seem to encounter exactly this situation and a simple > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > > would probably have cleared the warning. There is nothing wrong with your > client, its an issue with the client-MDS communication protocol that is > probably still under review. You will encounter these warnings every now > and then until its fixed. > > Best regards, > ================= > Frank Schilder > AIT Risø Campus > Bygning 109, rum S14 > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
