Suggestion:  Start with your requirements, vs the “ilities” of the storage 
system. 


By “ilities” I mean scalability, flexibility, distributability, durability, 
manageability, and so on - any storage system can and will lay (at least some) 
claim to those. 


What are the needs of your project? 

How does CEPH meet the needs of your project? 

How do the other systems NOT meet those requirements?





> On Apr 17, 2024, at 4:06 PM, sebci...@o2.pl wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
> I have problem to answer to this question:
> Why CEPH is better than other storage solutions? 
> 
> I know this high level texts about 
> - scalability,
> - flexibility,
> - distributed,
> - cost-Effectiveness
> 
> What convince me, but could be received also against, is ceph as a product 
> has everything what I need it mean:
> block storage (RBD),
> file storage (CephFS),
> object storage (S3, Swift)
> and "plugins" to run NFS, NVMe over Fabric, NFS on object storage.
> 
> Also many other features which are usually sold as a option (mirroring, geo 
> replication, etc) in paid solutions. 
> I have problem to write it done piece by piece. 
> I want convince my managers we are going in good direction.
> 
> Why not something from robin.io or purestorage, netapp, dell/EMC. From 
> opensource longhorn or openEBS.
> 
> If you have ideas please write it.
> 
> Thanks,
> S.
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io

Reply via email to