Eugen Block wrote:
> The large omap objects are discovered during deep-scrub, so you just have to
> deep-scrub the PG again to clear the warning.

That did it, thanks. I was quite close, though - I tried to scrub the PG
instead of deep scrub :-)

Thanks again!

-Yenya

> Zitat von Jan Kasprzak <[email protected]>:
> 
> > Hello, Ceph users,
> > 
> > on my Ceph cluster with my custom rgw-like front-end client storing
> > metadata to omap I got "1 large omap objects" warning. According to cluster
> > log, the large object is
> > 
> > osd.39 (osd.39) 2292 : cluster [WRN] Large omap object found. Object:
> > 76:0bfe63c7:::idx.00000000004:head PG: 76.e3c67fd0 (76.10) Key count:
> > 259173 Size (bytes): 12440304
> > 
> > I have increased the limit using
> > 
> > ceph config set osd osd_deep_scrub_large_omap_object_key_threshold 1000000
> > 
> > but the warning still remains. How can I get rid of the warning after
> > increasing the size limit?
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > -Yenya
> > 
> > --
> > | Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
> > | https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/                        GPG: 4096R/A45477D5 |
> >     We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on
> >     when it's necessary to compromise.                     --Larry Wall
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

-- 
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
| https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/                        GPG: 4096R/A45477D5 |
    We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on
    when it's necessary to compromise.                     --Larry Wall
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to