On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 2:59 AM Anthony D'Atri <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are these rear bay drives, hence the limit of 2? Or > You might consider an M.2 AIC adapter card with bifurcation. M.2 > enterprise SSDs are sunsetting but for retrofits you should be able to find > Micron 6450 units. > > What’s your workload like? > On average 10-50MB/s of write, with spikes up to a few hundred MB/s during evening/night time; it went up to 1GB/s during tests without a problem. All these are S3 workloads/tests. I would have to check that on site, RM does not show, however we are just about to migrate to new machines, which have 4 NVMe slots ... so I am really considering moving WAL/DB to NVMe, however I am still a little bit hesitant, since I am not really sure this will solve the problem of why radosgw/s3 stops after some time when setting crush reweight to 0 on one failed disk. We are doing the same thing on HPC where radosgw/s3 is not used and we are not experiencing this problem there. If we move WAL/DB to NVMe, and if one NVMe fails and we have to recover 10 OSDs for example, it would take much longer than if just 1 OSD has to be recovered (while users being unable to access s3). --- My suspicion is that when we set crush reweight of the failed disk to 0, all other affected disks from that pool disables some write (because of recovery) and some queue fills up which then stops/hangs radosgw... Rok _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
