Right now I have 4096. 36*100/3 => 1200. As recovery take ages I thought this might be the reason.
Stefan This mail was sent with my iPhone. Am 12.07.2013 um 17:03 schrieb Mark Nelson <mark.nel...@inktank.com>: > On 07/12/2013 09:53 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: >> 2013/7/12 Mark Nelson <mark.nel...@inktank.com>: >>> At large numbers of PGs it may not matter very much, but I don't think it >>> would hurt either! >>> >>> Basically this has to do with how ceph_stable_mod works. At >>> non-power-of-two values, the bucket counts aren't even, but that's only a >>> small part of the story and may ultimately only have a small effect on the >>> distribution unless the PG count is small. >> >> In case of 12 OSDs for each node, and a cluster made with 18 storage >> nodes are you suggesting: >> >> (12*18*100) / 3 = 7200 PGs, that rounded to an exponent of 2 means 8192 ? > > Well, our official recommendation on the website is PGS = OSDS * 100 / > replicas. I think the thought is that with sufficient numbers of OSDs the > behaviour of ceph_stable_mod shouldn't matter (much). At some point I'd like > to do a little more involved of an analysis to see how PG distribution > changes, but for now I wouldn't really expect a dramatic difference between > 7200 and 8192 PGs. > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
