There is same error in Cinder.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Michael Morgan <mmor...@dca.net> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:24:55PM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote: > > On 08/14/2013 02:22 PM, Michael Morgan wrote: > > >Hello Everyone, > > > > > > I have a Ceph test cluster doing storage for an OpenStack Grizzly > > > platform > > >(also testing). Upgrading to 0.67 went fine on the Ceph side with the > > >cluster > > >showing healthy but suddenly I can't upload images into Glance anymore. > The > > >upload fails and glance-api throws an error: > > > > > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 ERROR glance.api.v1.images > > >[4dcd9de0-af65-4902-a36d-afc5497605e7 3867c65db6cc48398a0f57ce53144e69 > > >5dbca756421c4a3eb0a1cc2f1ee3c67c] Failed to upload image > > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images Traceback (most > > >recent call last): > > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images File > > >"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/glance/api/v1/images.py", line 444, in > > >_upload > > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images > > >image_meta['size']) > > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images File > > >"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/glance/store/rbd.py", line 241, in add > > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images with > > >rados.Rados(conffile=self.conf_file, rados_id=self.user) as conn: > > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images File > > >"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rados.py", line 195, in __init__ > > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images raise > > >Error("Rados(): can't supply both rados_id and name") > > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images Error: Rados(): > > >can't supply both rados_id and name > > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images > > > > This would be a backwards-compatibility regression in the librados > > python bindings - a fix is in the dumpling branch, and a point > > release is in the works. You could add name=None to that rados.Rados() > > call in glance to work around it in the meantime. > > > > Josh > > > > > I'm not sure if there's a patch I need to track down for Glance or if > I > > > missed > > >a change in the necessary Glance/Ceph setup. Is anyone else seeing this > > >behavior? Thanks! > > > > > >-Mike > > That's what I ended up doing and it's working fine now. Thanks for the > confirmation and all the hard work on OpenStack integration. I look > forward to > the point release. > > -Mike > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -- Rongze Zhu <https://github.com/zhurongze>
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com