There is same error in Cinder.


On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Michael Morgan <mmor...@dca.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:24:55PM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
> > On 08/14/2013 02:22 PM, Michael Morgan wrote:
> > >Hello Everyone,
> > >
> > >  I have a Ceph test cluster doing storage for an OpenStack Grizzly
> > >  platform
> > >(also testing). Upgrading to 0.67 went fine on the Ceph side with the
> > >cluster
> > >showing healthy but suddenly I can't upload images into Glance anymore.
> The
> > >upload fails and glance-api throws an error:
> > >
> > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 ERROR glance.api.v1.images
> > >[4dcd9de0-af65-4902-a36d-afc5497605e7 3867c65db6cc48398a0f57ce53144e69
> > >5dbca756421c4a3eb0a1cc2f1ee3c67c] Failed to upload image
> > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images Traceback (most
> > >recent call last):
> > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images   File
> > >"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/glance/api/v1/images.py", line 444, in
> > >_upload
> > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images
> > >image_meta['size'])
> > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images   File
> > >"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/glance/store/rbd.py", line 241, in add
> > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images     with
> > >rados.Rados(conffile=self.conf_file, rados_id=self.user) as conn:
> > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images   File
> > >"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rados.py", line 195, in __init__
> > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images     raise
> > >Error("Rados(): can't supply both rados_id and name")
> > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images Error: Rados():
> > >can't supply both rados_id and name
> > >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images
> >
> > This would be a backwards-compatibility regression in the librados
> > python bindings - a fix is in the dumpling branch, and a point
> > release is in the works. You could add name=None to that rados.Rados()
> > call in glance to work around it in the meantime.
> >
> > Josh
> >
> > >  I'm not sure if there's a patch I need to track down for Glance or if
> I
> > >  missed
> > >a change in the necessary Glance/Ceph setup. Is anyone else seeing this
> > >behavior? Thanks!
> > >
> > >-Mike
>
> That's what I ended up doing and it's working fine now. Thanks for the
> confirmation and all the hard work on OpenStack integration. I look
> forward to
> the point release.
>
> -Mike
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>



-- 

Rongze Zhu
<https://github.com/zhurongze>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to