On Sep 18, 2013, at 11:50 PM, Gregory Farnum <g...@inktank.com>
 wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Dan Van Der Ster
> <daniel.vanders...@cern.ch> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We just finished debugging a problem with RBD-backed Glance image creation 
>> failures, and thought our workaround would be useful for others. Basically, 
>> we found that during an image upload, librbd on the glance api server was 
>> consuming many many processes, eventually hitting the 1024 nproc limit of 
>> non-root users in RHEL. The failure occurred when uploading to pools with 
>> 2048 PGs, but didn't fail when uploading to pools with 512 PGs (we're 
>> guessing that librbd is opening one thread per accessed-PG, and not closing 
>> those threads until the whole processes completes.)
>> 
>> If you hit this same problem (and you run RHEL like us), you'll need to 
>> modify at least /etc/security/limits.d/90-nproc.conf (adding your non-root 
>> user that should be allowed > 1024 procs), and then also possibly run ulimit 
>> -u in the init script of your client process. Ubuntu should have some 
>> similar limits.
> 
> Did your pools with 2048 PGs have a significantly larger number of
> OSDs in them? Or are both pools on a pool with a lot of OSDs relative
> to the PG counts?

1056 OSDs at the moment.

Uploading a 14GB image we observed up to ~1500 threads.

We set the glance client to allow 4096 processes for now.


> The PG count shouldn't matter for this directly, but RBD (and other
> clients) will create a couple messenger threads for each OSD it talks
> to, and while they'll eventually shut down on idle it doesn't
> proactively close them. I'd expect this to be a problem around 500
> OSDs.

A couple, is that the upper limit? Should we be safe with ulimit -u 2*nOSDs +1 
??

Cheers, Dan


> -Greg
> Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to