Hi Dima, Benchmark FYI.
$ /usr/sbin/bonnie++ -s 0 -n 5:1m:4k Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create-------- altair -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- files:max:min /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 5:1048576:4096 18 1 609 11 604 9 18 1 436 10 686 9 Latency 1187ms 70907us 261ms 2352ms 205ms 111ms - WP On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Dimitri Maziuk <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu>wrote: > On 2013-11-15 08:26, Gautam Saxena wrote: > >> Yip, >> >> I went to the link. Where can the script ( nfsceph) be downloaded? How's >> the robustness and performance of this technique? (That is, is there are >> any reason to believe that it would more/less robust and/or performant >> than option #3 mentioned in the original thread?) >> > > Note that it has 2 nfs servers in ha cluster: one goes down, the other one > takes over. In that sense it's more robust than just one server. > > I'd be curious to see the numbers, like bonnie++, on the server & nfs > client. > > Dima > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com