Hi Wido,
Thanks for the reply. I've dumped the query below.
"recovery_state" doesn't say anything, there are also no missing or
unfounded objects. What else could be wrong?
- WP
P.S: I am running tunables optimal already.
{ "state": "active+remapped",
"epoch": 6500,
"up": [
7],
"acting": [
7,
3],
"info": { "pgid": "1.fa",
"last_update": "0'0",
"last_complete": "0'0",
"log_tail": "0'0",
"last_user_version": 0,
"last_backfill": "MAX",
"purged_snaps": "[]",
"history": { "epoch_created": 1,
"last_epoch_started": 6377,
"last_epoch_clean": 6379,
"last_epoch_split": 0,
"same_up_since": 6365,
"same_interval_since": 6365,
"same_primary_since": 6348,
"last_scrub": "0'0",
"last_scrub_stamp": "2014-01-09 11:37:18.202247",
"last_deep_scrub": "0'0",
"last_deep_scrub_stamp": "2014-01-09 11:37:18.202247",
"last_clean_scrub_stamp": "2014-01-09 11:37:18.202247"},
"stats": { "version": "0'0",
"reported_seq": "4320",
"reported_epoch": "6500",
"state": "active+remapped",
"last_fresh": "2014-01-10 12:19:46.219163",
"last_change": "2014-01-10 11:18:53.147842",
"last_active": "2014-01-10 12:19:46.219163",
"last_clean": "2014-01-09 22:02:41.243761",
"last_became_active": "0.000000",
"last_unstale": "2014-01-10 12:19:46.219163",
"mapping_epoch": 6351,
"log_start": "0'0",
"ondisk_log_start": "0'0",
"created": 1,
"last_epoch_clean": 6379,
"parent": "0.0",
"parent_split_bits": 0,
"last_scrub": "0'0",
"last_scrub_stamp": "2014-01-09 11:37:18.202247",
"last_deep_scrub": "0'0",
"last_deep_scrub_stamp": "2014-01-09 11:37:18.202247",
"last_clean_scrub_stamp": "2014-01-09 11:37:18.202247",
"log_size": 0,
"ondisk_log_size": 0,
"stats_invalid": "0",
"stat_sum": { "num_bytes": 0,
"num_objects": 0,
"num_object_clones": 0,
"num_object_copies": 0,
"num_objects_missing_on_primary": 0,
"num_objects_degraded": 0,
"num_objects_unfound": 0,
"num_read": 0,
"num_read_kb": 0,
"num_write": 0,
"num_write_kb": 0,
"num_scrub_errors": 0,
"num_shallow_scrub_errors": 0,
"num_deep_scrub_errors": 0,
"num_objects_recovered": 0,
"num_bytes_recovered": 0,
"num_keys_recovered": 0},
"stat_cat_sum": {},
"up": [
7],
"acting": [
7,
3]},
"empty": 1,
"dne": 0,
"incomplete": 0,
"last_epoch_started": 6377},
"recovery_state": [
{ "name": "Started\/Primary\/Active",
"enter_time": "2014-01-10 11:18:53.147802",
"might_have_unfound": [],
"recovery_progress": { "backfill_target": -1,
"waiting_on_backfill": 0,
"last_backfill_started": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
"backfill_info": { "begin": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
"end": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
"objects": []},
"peer_backfill_info": { "begin": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
"end": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
"objects": []},
"backfills_in_flight": [],
"recovering": [],
"pg_backend": { "pull_from_peer": [],
"pushing": []}},
"scrub": { "scrubber.epoch_start": "4757",
"scrubber.active": 0,
"scrubber.block_writes": 0,
"scrubber.finalizing": 0,
"scrubber.waiting_on": 0,
"scrubber.waiting_on_whom": []}},
{ "name": "Started",
"enter_time": "2014-01-10 11:18:40.137868"}]}
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@42on.com> wrote:
> On 01/10/2014 05:13 AM, YIP Wai Peng wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have some pgs that are stuck_unclean, I'm trying to understand why.
>> Hopefully someone can help me shed some light on it.
>>
>> For example, one of them is
>>
>> # ceph pg dump_stuck unclean
>> 1.fa0000000active+remapped2014-01-10
>> 11:18:53.1478420'06452:4272[7][7,3]0'02014-01-09
>> 11:37:18.2022470'02014-01-09 11:37:18.202247
>>
>>
>>
>> My pool 1 looks like this
>>
>> pool 1 'metadata' rep size 2 min_size 1 crush_ruleset 3 object_hash
>> rjenkins pg_num 256 pgp_num 256 last_change 2605 owner 0
>>
>>
>> The rule 3 is
>>
>> rule different_host {
>> ruleset 3
>> type replicated
>> min_size 1
>> max_size 10
>> step take default
>> step chooseleaf firstn 0 type host
>> step emit
>> }
>>
>>
>> My osd tree looks like
>>
>> # idweighttype nameup/downreweight
>> -140root default
>> -73datacenter CR2
>> -53host ceph3
>> 61osd.6up1
>> 71osd.7up1
>> 81osd.8up1
>> <snip>
>> -93datacenter COM1
>> -66room 02-WIRECEN
>> -43host ceph2
>> 31osd.3up1
>> 41osd.4up1
>> 51osd.5up1
>>
>>
>> osd.7 and osd.3 are in different hosts, so the rule is satisfied. Why is
>> it still in the 'remapped' status, and what is it waiting for?
>>
>>
> Try:
>
> $ ceph pg 1.fa query
>
> That will tell you the cause of why the PG is stuck.
>
> - Peng
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>
>
> --
> Wido den Hollander
> 42on B.V.
>
> Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
> Skype: contact42on
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
