On 26.03.14, 17:48, Ирек Фасихов wrote:
Hi, Daniel.

I use the following settings:

net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies = 0
net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf=0
net.ipv4.tcp_low_latency = 1

Message "failed connection attempts", can be ignored, it is not just a server error, but the client. For example: A client lost its connection to the server.

It refers to connection *attemtps*, that means loss of established connection will not affect the counter.



2014-03-26 18:29 GMT+04:00 Dan Van Der Ster <daniel.vanders...@cern.ch <mailto:daniel.vanders...@cern.ch>>:

    Hi all,
    I recently noticed our OSD servers have a very large number of TCP
    failed connection attempts. This is typical (output from netstat -s):

        50329019 active connections openings
        15218590 passive connection openings
        44167087 failed connection attempts

Taking into account that presumably you don't have anything besides osd daemon running on the machine, i would say that this is extraordinarily large
number indicating that something is definitely going wrong.

    I’m not a TCP expert at all — but this doesn’t look good. Do
    others have similar numbers? Does anyone know if some ipv4 sysctl
    tuning can clear this up?

'netstat -s' provides verbose display of /proc/net/snmp counters for your information. These counters don't need to be reset or cleared up in some other way.

    Cheers, Dan


    -- Dan van der Ster || Data & Storage Services || CERN IT
    Department --

    _______________________________________________
    ceph-users mailing list
    ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
    http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




--
С уважением, Фасихов Ирек Нургаязович
Моб.: +79229045757


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to