_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Why are the defaults for 'cephx require signatures' and similar still
false? Is it still necessary to maintain backwards compatibility with
very old clients by default? It seems like from a security POV, you'd
want everything to be more secure out of the box, and require the user
to explicitly disable security if they need backwards compatibility with
ancient clients.
- [ceph-users] cephx authentication defaults Brian Rak
