Performance seems quite low on those. I’d really step it up to intel s3700s.
Check the performance benchmarks here and compare between them: http://www.anandtech.com/show/8066/crucial-mx100-256gb-512gb-review/3 http://www.anandtech.com/show/6433/intel-ssd-dc-s3700-200gb-review/3 If you’re going to run it in production I’d go with the intel one. Kind Regards, David 1 aug 2014 kl. 10:38 skrev Andrei Mikhailovsky <and...@arhont.com>: > Hello guys, > > Was wondering if anyone has tried using the Crucial MX100 ssds either for osd > journals or cache pool? It seems like a good cost effective alternative to > the more expensive drives and read/write performance is very good as well. > > Thanks > > -- > Andrei Mikhailovsky > Director > Arhont Information Security > > Web: http://www.arhont.com > http://www.wi-foo.com > Tel: +44 (0)870 4431337 > Fax: +44 (0)208 429 3111 > PGP: Key ID - 0x2B3438DE > PGP: Server - keyserver.pgp.com > > DISCLAIMER > > The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the > person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby > notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosure is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please > immediately advise us by return email at and...@arhont.com and delete and > purge the email and any attachments without making a copy. > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
