Hi Irek,
Got it, Thanks :)
—
idzzy
On August 22, 2014 at 6:17:52 PM, Irek Fasikhov (malm...@gmail.com) wrote:
node1: 4[TB], node2: 4[TB], node3: 4[TB] :)
22 авг. 2014 г. 12:53 пользователь "idzzy" <idez...@gmail.com> написал:
Hi Irek,
Understood.
Let me ask about only this.
> No, it's for the entire cluster.
Is this meant that total disk amount size of all nodes is over than 11.8 TB?
e.g node1: 4[TB], node2: 4[TB], node3: 4[TB]
not each node.
e.g node1: 11.8[TB], node2: 11.8[TB], node3:11.8 [TB]
Thank you.
On August 22, 2014 at 5:06:02 PM, Irek Fasikhov (malm...@gmail.com) wrote:
I recommend you use replication, because radosgw uses asynchronous replication.
Yes divided by nearfull ratio.
No, it's for the entire cluster.
2014-08-22 11:51 GMT+04:00 idzzy <idez...@gmail.com>:
Hi,
If not use replication, Is it only to divide by nearfull_ratio?
(does only radosgw support replication?)
10T/0.85 = 11.8 TB of each node?
# ceph pg dump | egrep "full_ratio|nearfulll_ratio"
full_ratio 0.95
nearfull_ratio 0.85
Sorry I’m not familiar with ceph architecture.
Thanks for the reply.
—
idzzy
On August 22, 2014 at 3:53:21 PM, Irek Fasikhov (malm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi.
10ТB*2/0.85 ~= 24 TB with two replications, total volume for the raw data.
--
С уважением, Фасихов Ирек Нургаязович
Моб.: +79229045757
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
