On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:08 AM, yuelongguang <fasts...@163.com> wrote:
> hi, > 1. if one radosgw daemon *corresponds* to one zone ? the rate is 1:1 > Not necessarily. You need at least one radosgw daemon per zone, but you can have more. I have a two small clusters. The primary has 5 nodes, and the secondary has 4 nodes. Every node in the clusters run an apache and radosgw. It's possible (and confusing) to run multiple radosgw daemons on a single node for different clusters. You can either use Apache VHosts, or have CivetWeb listening on different ports. I won't recommend this though, as it introduces a common failure mode to both zones. > 2. it seems that we can deploy any number of rgw in a gingle ceph > cluster, those rgw can work separately or cooperate by using radosgw-agent > to sync data and metadata, am i right? > You can deploy as many zones as you want in a single cluster. Each zone needs a set of pools and a radosgw daemon. They can be completely independant, or have a master-slave replication setup using radosgw-agent. Keep in mind that radosgw-agent is not bi-directional replication, and the secondary zone is read-only. > 3. do you know how to set up load balance for rgws? is nginx a good > choose, how to let nginx work with rgw? > Any Load Balancer should work, since the protocol is just HTTP/HTTPS. Some people on the list had issues with nginx. Search the list archive for radosgw and tengine. I'm using HAProxy, and it's working for me. I have a slight issue in my secondary cluster, with locking during replication. I believe I need to enable some kind of stickiness, but I haven't gotten around to investigating. In the mean time, I've configured that cluster with a single node in the active backend, and the other nodes in a backup backend. It's not a setup that can work for everybody, but it meets my needs until I fix the real issue.
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
