You mean `ceph -w` and `ceph -s` didn't show any PGs in the active+clean+scrubbing state while pool 2's PGs were being scrubbed?
I see that happen with my really small pools. I have a bunch of RadosGW pools that contain <5 objects, and ~1kB of data. When I scrub the PGs in those pools, they complete so fast that they never show up in `ceph -w`. Since you have pools 0, 1, and 2, I assume those are the default 'data', 'metadata', and 'rdb'. If you're not using RDB, then the rdb pool will be very small. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Mallikarjun Biradar < mallikarjuna.bira...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was running scrub while cluster is in re-balancing state. > > From the osd logs.. > > 2014-12-02 18:50:26.934802 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 0.3 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:50:27.890785 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 0.24 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:50:31.902978 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 0.25 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:50:33.088060 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 0.33 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:50:50.828893 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.61 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:51:06.774648 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.68 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:51:20.463283 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.80 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:51:39.883295 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.89 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:52:00.568808 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.9f scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:52:15.897191 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.a3 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:52:34.681874 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.aa scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:52:47.833630 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.b1 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:53:09.312792 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.b3 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:53:25.324635 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.bd scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:53:48.638475 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.c3 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:54:02.996972 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.d7 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:54:19.660038 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.d8 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:54:32.780646 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 1.fa scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:54:36.772931 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.4 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:54:41.758487 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.9 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:54:46.910043 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.a scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:54:51.908335 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.16 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:54:54.940807 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.19 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:55:00.956170 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.44 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:55:01.948455 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.4f scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:55:07.273587 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.76 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:55:10.641274 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.9e scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:55:11.621669 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.ab scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:55:18.261900 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.b0 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:55:19.560766 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.b1 scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:55:20.501591 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.bb scrub ok > 2014-12-02 18:55:21.523936 7fcc6b614700 0 log_channel(default) log [INF] > : 2.cd scrub ok > > Interestingly, for pg's 2.x (2.4, 2.9 etc)in logs here, cluster status was > not reporting scrubbing, whereas for 0.x & 1.x it was reporting as > scrubbing in cluster status. > > In case of scrub operation on PG's (2.x) is really scrubbing performed OR > cluster status is missing to report them? > > -Thanks & Regards, > Mallikarjun Biradar > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
