On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Christopher Kunz wrote: > Hi, > > [redirecting back to list] > > Oh, it could be that... can you include the output from 'ceph osd tree'? > > That's a more concise view that shows up/down, weight, and in/out. > > > > Thanks! > > sage > > > > root@cepharm17:~# ceph osd tree > # id weight type name up/down reweight > -1 0.52 root default > -21 0.16 chassis board0 > -2 0.032 host cepharm11 > 0 0.032 osd.0 up 1 > -3 0.032 host cepharm12 > 1 0.032 osd.1 up 1 > -4 0.032 host cepharm13 > 2 0.032 osd.2 up 1 > -5 0.032 host cepharm14 > 3 0.032 osd.3 up 1 > -6 0.032 host cepharm16 > 4 0.032 osd.4 up 1 > -22 0.18 chassis board1 > -7 0.03 host cepharm18 > 5 0.03 osd.5 up 1 > -8 0.03 host cepharm19 > 6 0.03 osd.6 up 1 > -9 0.03 host cepharm20 > 7 0.03 osd.7 up 1 > -10 0.03 host cepharm21 > 8 0.03 osd.8 up 1 > -11 0.03 host cepharm22 > 9 0.03 osd.9 up 1 > -12 0.03 host cepharm23 > 10 0.03 osd.10 up 1 > -23 0.18 chassis board2 > -13 0.03 host cepharm25 > 11 0.03 osd.11 up 1 > -14 0.03 host cepharm26 > 12 0.03 osd.12 up 1 > -15 0.03 host cepharm27 > 13 0.03 osd.13 up 1 > -16 0.03 host cepharm28 > 14 0.03 osd.14 up 1 > -17 0.03 host cepharm29 > 15 0.03 osd.15 up 1 > -18 0.03 host cepharm30 > 16 0.03 osd.16 up 1
Okay, it sounds like something is not quite right then. Can you attach the OSDMap once it is in the not-quite-repaired state? And/or try setting 'ceph osd crush tunables optimal' and see if that has any effect? > I am working on one of these boxes: > <http://www.ambedded.com.tw/pt_spec.php?P_ID=20141109001> > So, each chassis is one 7-node board (with a shared 1gbe switch and > shared electrical supply), and I figured each board is definitely a > separate failure domain. Cute! That kind of looks like 3 sleds of 7 in one chassis though? Or am I looking at the wrong thing? sage _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
