Robert -- We are still having trouble with this.
Can you share your [client.radosgw.gateway] section of ceph.conf and were there any other special things to be aware of? -- Tom -----Original Message----- From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Robert LeBlanc Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 12:27 PM To: Sage Weil Cc: Ceph-User; ceph-devel Subject: Re: [ceph-users] who is using radosgw with civetweb? Thanks, we were able to get it up and running very quickly. If it performs well, I don't see any reason to use Apache+fast_cgi. I don't have any problems just focusing on civetweb. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sage Weil <sw...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Robert LeBlanc wrote: >> We tried to get radosgw working with Apache + mod_fastcgi, but due to >> the changes in radosgw, Apache, mode_*cgi, etc and the documentation >> lagging and not having a lot of time to devote to it, we abandoned it. >> Where it the documentation for civetweb? If it is appliance like and >> easy to set-up, we would like to try it to offer some feedback on >> your question. > > In giant and hammer, it is enabled by default on port 7480. On > firefly, you need to add the line > > rgw frontends = fastcgi, civetweb port=7480 > > to ceph.conf (you can of course adjust the port number if you like) > and radosgw will run standalone w/ no apache or anything else. > > sage > > >> >> Thanks, >> Robert LeBlanc >> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Sage Weil <sw...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Hey, >> > >> > We are considering switching to civetweb (the embedded/standalone >> > rgw web >> > server) as the primary supported RGW frontend instead of the >> > current apache + mod-fastcgi or mod-proxy-fcgi approach. >> > "Supported" here means both the primary platform the upstream >> > development focuses on and what the downstream Red Hat product will >> > officially support. >> > >> > How many people are using RGW standalone using the embedded >> > civetweb server instead of apache? In production? At what scale? >> > What >> > version(s) (civetweb first appeared in firefly and we've backported >> > most fixes). >> > >> > Have you seen any problems? Any other feedback? The hope is to >> > (vastly) simplify deployment. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > sage >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ceph-users mailing list >> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" >> in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo >> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
