Hi, We did it the other way around instead, defining a period where the load is lighter and turn off/on backfill/recover. Then you want the backfill values to be the what is default right now.
Also, someone said that (think it was Greg?) If you have problems with backfill, your cluster backing store is not fast enough/too much load. If 10 osds goes down at the same time you want those values to be high to minimize the downtime. /Josef fre 29 maj 2015 23:47 Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> skrev: > Many people have reported that they need to lower the osd recovery config > options to minimize the impact of recovery on client io. We are talking > about changing the defaults as follows: > > osd_max_backfills to 1 (from 10) > osd_recovery_max_active to 3 (from 15) > osd_recovery_op_priority to 1 (from 10) > osd_recovery_max_single_start to 1 (from 5) > > We'd like a bit of feedback first though. Is anyone happy with the > current configs? Is anyone using something between these values and the > current defaults? What kind of workload? I'd guess that lowering > osd_max_backfills to 1 is probably a good idea, but I wonder whether > lowering osd_recovery_max_active and osd_recovery_max_single_start will > cause small objects to recover unacceptably slowly. > > Thoughts? > -Sam > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
