Actually it's looks reasonable to me and we already got the same conclusion for latency with SSD.
I think potential direction is that we need to reduce cpu util for osd. Reduce high-end cpu dependent degree for ssd On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> wrote: > Hi All, > > I know there has been lots of discussions around needing fast CPU's to get > the most out of SSD's. However I have never really ever seen an solid > numbers to make a comparison about how much difference a faster CPU makes > and if Ceph scales linearly with clockspeed. So I did a little experiment > today. > > I setup a 1 OSD Ceph instance on a Desktop PC. The Desktop has a i5 > Sandbybridge CPU with the CPU turbo overclocked to 4.3ghz. By using the > userspace governor in Linux, I was able to set static clock speeds to see > the possible performance effects on Ceph. My pc only has an old X25M-G2 SSD, > so I had to limit the IO testing to 4kb QD=1, as otherwise the SSD ran out > of puff when I got to the higher clock speeds. > > CPU Mhz 4Kb Write IO Min Latency (us) Avg Latency (us) CPU > usr CPU sys > 1600 797 886 1250 > 10.14 2.35 > 2000 815 746 1222 > 8.45 1.82 > 2400 1161 630 857 > 9.5 1.6 > 2800 1227 549 812 > 8.74 1.24 > 3300 1320 482 755 > 7.87 1.08 > 4300 1548 437 644 > 7.72 0.9 > > The figures show a fairly linear trend right through the clock range and > clearly shows the importance of having fast CPU's (Ghz not cores) if you > want to achieve high IO, especially at low queue depths. > > > Things to Note > These figures are from a desktop CPU, no doubt Xeons will be slightly faster > at the same clock speed > I assuming using the userspace governor in this way is a realistic way to > simulate different CPU clock speeds? > My old SSD is probably skewing the figures slightly > I have complete control over the turbo settings and big cooling, many server > CPU's will limit the max turbo if multiple cores are under load or get too > hot > Ceph SSD OSD nodes are probably best with high end E3 CPU's as they have the > highest clock speeds > HDD's with Journals will probably benefit slightly from higher clock speeds, > if the disk isn't the bottleneck (ie small block sequential writes) > These numbers are for Replica=1, at 2 or 3 these numbers will be at least > half I would imagine > > > I hope someone finds this useful > > Nick > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Best Regards, Wheat _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
