I change the "mds_cache_size" to 500000 from 100000 get rid of the
WARN temporary.
Now dumping the mds daemon shows like this:
"inode_max": 500000,
"inodes": 124213,
But i have no idea if the "indoes" rises more than 500000 , change the
"mds_cache_size" again?
Thanks.
2015-07-15 13:34 GMT+08:00 谷枫 <feiche...@gmail.com>:
> I change the "mds_cache_size" to 500000 from 100000 get rid of the
> WARN temporary.
> Now dumping the mds daemon shows like this:
> "inode_max": 500000,
> "inodes": 124213,
> But i have no idea if the "indoes" rises more than 500000 , change the
> "mds_cache_size" again?
> Thanks.
>
> 2015-07-15 11:06 GMT+08:00 Eric Eastman <eric.east...@keepertech.com>:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I cut the test down to a single client running only Ganesha NFS
>> without any ceph drivers loaded on the Ceph FS client. After deleting
>> all the files in the Ceph file system, rebooting all the nodes, I
>> restarted the create 5 million file test using 2 NFS clients to the
>> one Ceph file system node running Ganesha NFS. After a couple hours I
>> am seeing the client ede-c2-gw01 failing to respond to cache pressure
>> error:
>>
>> $ ceph -s
>> cluster 6d8aae1e-1125-11e5-a708-001b78e265be
>> health HEALTH_WARN
>> mds0: Client ede-c2-gw01 failing to respond to cache pressure
>> monmap e1: 3 mons at
>> {ede-c2-mon01=
>> 10.15.2.121:6789/0,ede-c2-mon02=10.15.2.122:6789/0,ede-c2-mon03=10.15.2.123:6789/0
>> }
>> election epoch 22, quorum 0,1,2
>> ede-c2-mon01,ede-c2-mon02,ede-c2-mon03
>> mdsmap e1860: 1/1/1 up {0=ede-c2-mds02=up:active}, 2 up:standby
>> osdmap e323: 8 osds: 8 up, 8 in
>> pgmap v302142: 832 pgs, 4 pools, 162 GB data, 4312 kobjects
>> 182 GB used, 78459 MB / 263 GB avail
>> 832 active+clean
>>
>> Dumping the mds daemon shows inodes > inodes_max:
>>
>> # ceph daemon mds.ede-c2-mds02 perf dump mds
>> {
>> "mds": {
>> "request": 21862302,
>> "reply": 21862302,
>> "reply_latency": {
>> "avgcount": 21862302,
>> "sum": 16728.480772060
>> },
>> "forward": 0,
>> "dir_fetch": 13,
>> "dir_commit": 50788,
>> "dir_split": 0,
>> "inode_max": 100000,
>> "inodes": 100010,
>> "inodes_top": 0,
>> "inodes_bottom": 0,
>> "inodes_pin_tail": 100010,
>> "inodes_pinned": 100010,
>> "inodes_expired": 4308279,
>> "inodes_with_caps": 99998,
>> "caps": 99998,
>> "subtrees": 2,
>> "traverse": 30802465,
>> "traverse_hit": 26394836,
>> "traverse_forward": 0,
>> "traverse_discover": 0,
>> "traverse_dir_fetch": 0,
>> "traverse_remote_ino": 0,
>> "traverse_lock": 0,
>> "load_cent": 2186230200,
>> "q": 0,
>> "exported": 0,
>> "exported_inodes": 0,
>> "imported": 0,
>> "imported_inodes": 0
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Once this test finishes and I verify the files were all correctly
>> written, I will retest using the SAMBA VFS interface, followed by the
>> kernel test.
>>
>> Please let me know if there is more info you need and if you want me
>> to open a ticket.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Eric Eastman
>> <eric.east...@keepertech.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks John. I will back the test down to the simple case of 1 client
>> > without the kernel driver and only running NFS Ganesha, and work forward
>> > till I trip the problem and report my findings.
>> >
>> > Eric
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 2:18 AM, John Spray <john.sp...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 13/07/2015 04:02, Eric Eastman wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi John,
>> >>>
>> >>> I am seeing this problem with Ceph v9.0.1 with the v4.1 kernel on all
>> >>> nodes. This system is using 4 Ceph FS client systems. They all have
>> >>> the kernel driver version of CephFS loaded, but none are mounting the
>> >>> file system. All 4 clients are using the libcephfs VFS interface to
>> >>> Ganesha NFS (V2.2.0-2) and Samba (Version 4.3.0pre1-GIT-0791bb0) to
>> >>> share out the Ceph file system.
>> >>>
>> >>> # ceph -s
>> >>> cluster 6d8aae1e-1125-11e5-a708-001b78e265be
>> >>> health HEALTH_WARN
>> >>> 4 near full osd(s)
>> >>> mds0: Client ede-c2-gw01 failing to respond to cache
>> >>> pressure
>> >>> mds0: Client ede-c2-gw02:cephfs failing to respond to
>> cache
>> >>> pressure
>> >>> mds0: Client ede-c2-gw03:cephfs failing to respond to
>> cache
>> >>> pressure
>> >>> monmap e1: 3 mons at
>> >>>
>> >>> {ede-c2-mon01=
>> 10.15.2.121:6789/0,ede-c2-mon02=10.15.2.122:6789/0,ede-c2-mon03=10.15.2.123:6789/0
>> }
>> >>> election epoch 8, quorum 0,1,2
>> >>> ede-c2-mon01,ede-c2-mon02,ede-c2-mon03
>> >>> mdsmap e912: 1/1/1 up {0=ede-c2-mds03=up:active}, 2 up:standby
>> >>> osdmap e272: 8 osds: 8 up, 8 in
>> >>> pgmap v225264: 832 pgs, 4 pools, 188 GB data, 5173 kobjects
>> >>> 212 GB used, 48715 MB / 263 GB avail
>> >>> 832 active+clean
>> >>> client io 1379 kB/s rd, 20653 B/s wr, 98 op/s
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> It would help if we knew whether it's the kernel clients or the
>> userspace
>> >> clients that are generating the warnings here. You've probably
>> already done
>> >> this, but I'd get rid of any unused kernel client mounts to simplify
>> the
>> >> situation.
>> >>
>> >> We haven't tested the cache limit enforcement with NFS Ganesha, so
>> there
>> >> is a decent chance that it is broken. The ganehsha FSAL is doing
>> >> ll_get/ll_put reference counting on inodes, so it seems quite possible
>> that
>> >> its cache is pinning things that we would otherwise be evicting in
>> response
>> >> to cache pressure. You mention samba as well,
>> >>
>> >> You can see if the MDS cache is indeed exceeding its limit by looking
>> at
>> >> the output of:
>> >> ceph daemon mds.<daemon id> perf dump mds
>> >>
>> >> ...where the "inodes" value tells you how many are in the cache, vs.
>> >> inode_max.
>> >>
>> >> If you can, it would be useful to boil this down to a straightforward
>> test
>> >> case: if you start with a healthy cluster, mount a single ganesha
>> client,
>> >> and do your 5 million file procedure, do you get the warning? Same for
>> >> samba/kernel mounts -- this is likely to be a client side issue, so we
>> need
>> >> to confirm which client is misbehaving.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> John
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> # cat /proc/version
>> >>> Linux version 4.1.0-040100-generic (kernel@gomeisa) (gcc version
>> 4.6.3
>> >>> (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #201506220235 SMP Mon Jun 22 06:36:19
>> >>> UTC 2015
>> >>>
>> >>> # ceph -v
>> >>> ceph version 9.0.1 (997b3f998d565a744bfefaaf34b08b891f8dbf64)
>> >>>
>> >>> The systems are all running Ubuntu Trusty that has been upgraded to
>> >>> the 4.1 kernel. This is all physical machines and no VMs. The test
>> >>> run that caused the problem was create and verifying 5 million small
>> >>> files.
>> >>>
>> >>> We have some tools that flag when Ceph is in a WARN state so it would
>> >>> be nice to get rid of this warning.
>> >>>
>> >>> Please let me know what additional information you need.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>>
>> >>> Eric
>> >>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
