Is the number of inconsistent objects growing?  Can you attach the
whole ceph.log from the 6 hours before and after the snippet you
linked above?  Are you using cache/tiering?  Can you attach the osdmap
(ceph osd getmap -o <outfile>)?
-Sam

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Voloshanenko Igor
<igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ceph - 0.94.2
> Its happen during rebalancing
>
> I thought too, that some OSD miss copy, but looks like all miss...
> So any advice in which direction i need to go
>
> 2015-08-18 14:14 GMT+03:00 Gregory Farnum <gfar...@redhat.com>:
>>
>> From a quick peek it looks like some of the OSDs are missing clones of
>> objects. I'm not sure how that could happen and I'd expect the pg
>> repair to handle that but if it's not there's probably something
>> wrong; what version of Ceph are you running? Sam, is this something
>> you've seen, a new bug, or some kind of config issue?
>> -Greg
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Voloshanenko Igor
>> <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi all, at our production cluster, due high rebalancing ((( we have 2
>> > pgs in
>> > inconsistent state...
>> >
>> > root@temp:~# ceph health detail | grep inc
>> > HEALTH_ERR 2 pgs inconsistent; 18 scrub errors
>> > pg 2.490 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [56,15,29]
>> > pg 2.c4 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [56,10,42]
>> >
>> > From OSD logs, after recovery attempt:
>> >
>> > root@test:~# ceph pg dump | grep -i incons | cut -f 1 | while read i; do
>> > ceph pg repair ${i} ; done
>> > dumped all in format plain
>> > instructing pg 2.490 on osd.56 to repair
>> > instructing pg 2.c4 on osd.56 to repair
>> >
>> > /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.56.log:51:2015-08-18 07:26:37.035910 7f94663b3700
>> > -1
>> > log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : deep-scrub 2.490
>> > f5759490/rbd_data.1631755377d7e.00000000000004da/head//2 expected clone
>> > 90c59490/rbd_data.eb486436f2beb.0000000000007a65/141//2
>> > /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.56.log:52:2015-08-18 07:26:37.035960 7f94663b3700
>> > -1
>> > log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : deep-scrub 2.490
>> > fee49490/rbd_data.12483d3ba0794b.000000000000522f/head//2 expected clone
>> > f5759490/rbd_data.1631755377d7e.00000000000004da/141//2
>> > /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.56.log:53:2015-08-18 07:26:37.036133 7f94663b3700
>> > -1
>> > log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : deep-scrub 2.490
>> > a9b39490/rbd_data.12483d3ba0794b.00000000000037b3/head//2 expected clone
>> > fee49490/rbd_data.12483d3ba0794b.000000000000522f/141//2
>> > /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.56.log:54:2015-08-18 07:26:37.036243 7f94663b3700
>> > -1
>> > log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : deep-scrub 2.490
>> > bac19490/rbd_data.1238e82ae8944a.000000000000032e/head//2 expected clone
>> > a9b39490/rbd_data.12483d3ba0794b.00000000000037b3/141//2
>> > /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.56.log:55:2015-08-18 07:26:37.036289 7f94663b3700
>> > -1
>> > log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : deep-scrub 2.490
>> > 98519490/rbd_data.123e9c2ae8944a.0000000000000807/head//2 expected clone
>> > bac19490/rbd_data.1238e82ae8944a.000000000000032e/141//2
>> > /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.56.log:56:2015-08-18 07:26:37.036314 7f94663b3700
>> > -1
>> > log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : deep-scrub 2.490
>> > c3c09490/rbd_data.1238e82ae8944a.0000000000000c2b/head//2 expected clone
>> > 98519490/rbd_data.123e9c2ae8944a.0000000000000807/141//2
>> > /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.56.log:57:2015-08-18 07:26:37.036363 7f94663b3700
>> > -1
>> > log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : deep-scrub 2.490
>> > 28809490/rbd_data.edea7460fe42b.00000000000001d9/head//2 expected clone
>> > c3c09490/rbd_data.1238e82ae8944a.0000000000000c2b/141//2
>> > /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.56.log:58:2015-08-18 07:26:37.036432 7f94663b3700
>> > -1
>> > log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : deep-scrub 2.490
>> > e1509490/rbd_data.1423897545e146.00000000000009a6/head//2 expected clone
>> > 28809490/rbd_data.edea7460fe42b.00000000000001d9/141//2
>> > /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.56.log:59:2015-08-18 07:26:38.548765 7f94663b3700
>> > -1
>> > log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : 2.490 deep-scrub 17 errors
>> >
>> > So, how i can solve "expected clone" situation by hand?
>> > Thank in advance!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ceph-users mailing list
>> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to