Good joke )))))))))

2015-08-21 2:06 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com>:

> Certainly, don't reproduce this with a cluster you care about :).
> -Sam
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > What's supposed to happen is that the client transparently directs all
> > requests to the cache pool rather than the cold pool when there is a
> > cache pool.  If the kernel is sending requests to the cold pool,
> > that's probably where the bug is.  Odd.  It could also be a bug
> > specific 'forward' mode either in the client or on the osd.  Why did
> > you have it in that mode?
> > -Sam
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Voloshanenko Igor
> > <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> We used 4.x branch, as we have "very good" Samsung 850 pro in
> production,
> >> and they don;t support ncq_trim...
> >>
> >> And 4,x first branch which include exceptions for this in libsata.c.
> >>
> >> sure we can backport this 1 line to 3.x branch, but we prefer no to go
> >> deeper if packege for new kernel exist.
> >>
> >> 2015-08-21 1:56 GMT+03:00 Voloshanenko Igor <
> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> root@test:~# uname -a
> >>> Linux ix-s5 4.0.4-040004-generic #201505171336 SMP Sun May 17 17:37:22
> UTC
> >>> 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >>>
> >>> 2015-08-21 1:54 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, can you include the kernel version?
> >>>> -Sam
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> > Snapshotting with cache/tiering *is* supposed to work.  Can you
> open a
> >>>> > bug?
> >>>> > -Sam
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Andrija Panic
> >>>> > <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >> This was related to the caching layer, which doesnt support
> >>>> >> snapshooting per
> >>>> >> docs...for sake of closing the thread.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On 17 August 2015 at 21:15, Voloshanenko Igor
> >>>> >> <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>
> >>>> >> wrote:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Hi all, can you please help me with unexplained situation...
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> All snapshot inside ceph broken...
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> So, as example, we have VM template, as rbd inside ceph.
> >>>> >>> We can map it and mount to check that all ok with it
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd map
> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5
> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd0
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# parted /dev/rbd0 print
> >>>> >>> Model: Unknown (unknown)
> >>>> >>> Disk /dev/rbd0: 10.7GB
> >>>> >>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> >>>> >>> Partition Table: msdos
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Number  Start   End     Size    Type     File system  Flags
> >>>> >>>  1      1049kB  525MB   524MB   primary  ext4         boot
> >>>> >>>  2      525MB   10.7GB  10.2GB  primary               lvm
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Than i want to create snap, so i do:
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd snap create
> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> And now i want to map it:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd map
> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap
> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# parted /dev/rbd1 print
> >>>> >>> Warning: Unable to open /dev/rbd1 read-write (Read-only file
> system).
> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1 has been opened read-only.
> >>>> >>> Warning: Unable to open /dev/rbd1 read-write (Read-only file
> system).
> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1 has been opened read-only.
> >>>> >>> Error: /dev/rbd1: unrecognised disk label
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Even md5 different...
> >>>> >>> root@ix-s2:~# md5sum /dev/rbd0
> >>>> >>> 9a47797a07fee3a3d71316e22891d752  /dev/rbd0
> >>>> >>> root@ix-s2:~# md5sum /dev/rbd1
> >>>> >>> e450f50b9ffa0073fae940ee858a43ce  /dev/rbd1
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Ok, now i protect snap and create clone... but same thing...
> >>>> >>> md5 for clone same as for snap,,
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd unmap /dev/rbd1
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd snap protect
> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd clone
> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap
> >>>> >>> cold-storage/test-image
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd map cold-storage/test-image
> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# md5sum /dev/rbd1
> >>>> >>> e450f50b9ffa0073fae940ee858a43ce  /dev/rbd1
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> .... but it's broken...
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# parted /dev/rbd1 print
> >>>> >>> Error: /dev/rbd1: unrecognised disk label
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> =========
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> tech details:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph -v
> >>>> >>> ceph version 0.94.2 (5fb85614ca8f354284c713a2f9c610860720bbf3)
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> We have 2 inconstistent pgs, but all images not placed on this
> pgs...
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph health detail
> >>>> >>> HEALTH_ERR 2 pgs inconsistent; 18 scrub errors
> >>>> >>> pg 2.490 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [56,15,29]
> >>>> >>> pg 2.c4 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [56,10,42]
> >>>> >>> 18 scrub errors
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> ============
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph osd map cold-storage
> >>>> >>> 0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5
> >>>> >>> osdmap e16770 pool 'cold-storage' (2) object
> >>>> >>> '0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5' -> pg 2.74458f70 (2.770)
> -> up
> >>>> >>> ([37,15,14], p37) acting ([37,15,14], p37)
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph osd map cold-storage
> >>>> >>> 0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@snap
> >>>> >>> osdmap e16770 pool 'cold-storage' (2) object
> >>>> >>> '0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@snap' -> pg 2.793cd4a3
> (2.4a3)
> >>>> >>> -> up
> >>>> >>> ([12,23,17], p12) acting ([12,23,17], p12)
> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph osd map cold-storage
> >>>> >>> 0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@test-image
> >>>> >>> osdmap e16770 pool 'cold-storage' (2) object
> >>>> >>> '0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@test-image' -> pg
> 2.9519c2a9
> >>>> >>> (2.2a9)
> >>>> >>> -> up ([12,44,23], p12) acting ([12,44,23], p12)
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Also we use cache layer, which in current moment - in forward
> mode...
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Can you please help me with this.. As my brain stop to understand
> >>>> >>> what is
> >>>> >>> going on...
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Thank in advance!
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> >>> ceph-users mailing list
> >>>> >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> >>>> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> --
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Andrija Panić
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>> >> ceph-users mailing list
> >>>> >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> >>>> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >>>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to