Exactly пятница, 21 августа 2015 г. пользователь Samuel Just написал:
> And you adjusted the journals by removing the osd, recreating it with > a larger journal, and reinserting it? > -Sam > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Voloshanenko Igor > <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Right ( but also was rebalancing cycle 2 day before pgs corrupted) > > > > 2015-08-21 2:23 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com <javascript:;>>: > >> > >> Specifically, the snap behavior (we already know that the pgs went > >> inconsistent while the pool was in writeback mode, right?). > >> -Sam > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > Yeah, I'm trying to confirm that the issues did happen in writeback > >> > mode. > >> > -Sam > >> > > >> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Voloshanenko Igor > >> > <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >> Right. But issues started... > >> >> > >> >> 2015-08-21 2:20 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com > <javascript:;>>: > >> >>> > >> >>> But that was still in writeback mode, right? > >> >>> -Sam > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Voloshanenko Igor > >> >>> <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >>> > WE haven't set values for max_bytes / max_objects.. and all data > >> >>> > initially > >> >>> > writes only to cache layer and not flushed at all to cold layer. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Then we received notification from monitoring that we collect > about > >> >>> > 750GB in > >> >>> > hot pool ) So i changed values for max_object_bytes to be 0,9 of > >> >>> > disk > >> >>> > size... And then evicting/flushing started... > >> >>> > > >> >>> > And issue with snapshots arrived > >> >>> > > >> >>> > 2015-08-21 2:15 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com > <javascript:;>>: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Not sure what you mean by: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> but it's stop to work in same moment, when cache layer fulfilled > >> >>> >> with > >> >>> >> data and evict/flush started... > >> >>> >> -Sam > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Voloshanenko Igor > >> >>> >> <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >>> >> > No, when we start draining cache - bad pgs was in place... > >> >>> >> > We have big rebalance (disk by disk - to change journal side on > >> >>> >> > both > >> >>> >> > hot/cold layers).. All was Ok, but after 2 days - arrived scrub > >> >>> >> > errors > >> >>> >> > and 2 > >> >>> >> > pgs inconsistent... > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > In writeback - yes, looks like snapshot works good. but it's > stop > >> >>> >> > to > >> >>> >> > work in > >> >>> >> > same moment, when cache layer fulfilled with data and > evict/flush > >> >>> >> > started... > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > 2015-08-21 2:09 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com > <javascript:;>>: > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> So you started draining the cache pool before you saw either > the > >> >>> >> >> inconsistent pgs or the anomalous snap behavior? (That is, > >> >>> >> >> writeback > >> >>> >> >> mode was working correctly?) > >> >>> >> >> -Sam > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Voloshanenko Igor > >> >>> >> >> <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >>> >> >> > Good joke ))))))))) > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > 2015-08-21 2:06 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com > <javascript:;>>: > >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> Certainly, don't reproduce this with a cluster you care > about > >> >>> >> >> >> :). > >> >>> >> >> >> -Sam > >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Samuel Just > >> >>> >> >> >> <sj...@redhat.com <javascript:;>> > >> >>> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >>> >> >> >> > What's supposed to happen is that the client > transparently > >> >>> >> >> >> > directs > >> >>> >> >> >> > all > >> >>> >> >> >> > requests to the cache pool rather than the cold pool when > >> >>> >> >> >> > there > >> >>> >> >> >> > is > >> >>> >> >> >> > a > >> >>> >> >> >> > cache pool. If the kernel is sending requests to the > cold > >> >>> >> >> >> > pool, > >> >>> >> >> >> > that's probably where the bug is. Odd. It could also > be a > >> >>> >> >> >> > bug > >> >>> >> >> >> > specific 'forward' mode either in the client or on the > osd. > >> >>> >> >> >> > Why > >> >>> >> >> >> > did > >> >>> >> >> >> > you have it in that mode? > >> >>> >> >> >> > -Sam > >> >>> >> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Voloshanenko Igor > >> >>> >> >> >> > <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >>> >> >> >> >> We used 4.x branch, as we have "very good" Samsung 850 > pro > >> >>> >> >> >> >> in > >> >>> >> >> >> >> production, > >> >>> >> >> >> >> and they don;t support ncq_trim... > >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> And 4,x first branch which include exceptions for this > in > >> >>> >> >> >> >> libsata.c. > >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> sure we can backport this 1 line to 3.x branch, but we > >> >>> >> >> >> >> prefer > >> >>> >> >> >> >> no > >> >>> >> >> >> >> to > >> >>> >> >> >> >> go > >> >>> >> >> >> >> deeper if packege for new kernel exist. > >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> 2015-08-21 1:56 GMT+03:00 Voloshanenko Igor > >> >>> >> >> >> >> <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>: > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> root@test:~# uname -a > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Linux ix-s5 4.0.4-040004-generic #201505171336 SMP Sun > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> May 17 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> 17:37:22 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> UTC > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> 2015-08-21 1:54 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just < > sj...@redhat.com <javascript:;>>: > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> Also, can you include the kernel version? > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> -Sam > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Samuel Just > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> <sj...@redhat.com <javascript:;>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > Snapshotting with cache/tiering *is* supposed to > work. > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > Can > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > you > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > open a > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > bug? > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > -Sam > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Andrija Panic > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > <andrija.pa...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> This was related to the caching layer, which doesnt > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> support > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> snapshooting per > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> docs...for sake of closing the thread. > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> On 17 August 2015 at 21:15, Voloshanenko Igor > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> wrote: > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Hi all, can you please help me with unexplained > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> situation... > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> All snapshot inside ceph broken... > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> So, as example, we have VM template, as rbd inside > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ceph. > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> We can map it and mount to check that all ok with > it > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd map > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd0 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# parted /dev/rbd0 print > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Model: Unknown (unknown) > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Disk /dev/rbd0: 10.7GB > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Partition Table: msdos > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Number Start End Size Type File > system > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Flags > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 1 1049kB 525MB 524MB primary ext4 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> boot > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2 525MB 10.7GB 10.2GB primary > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> lvm > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Than i want to create snap, so i do: > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd snap create > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> And now i want to map it: > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd map > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# parted /dev/rbd1 print > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Warning: Unable to open /dev/rbd1 read-write > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (Read-only > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> file > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> system). > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1 has been opened read-only. > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Warning: Unable to open /dev/rbd1 read-write > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (Read-only > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> file > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> system). > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1 has been opened read-only. > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Error: /dev/rbd1: unrecognised disk label > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Even md5 different... > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@ix-s2:~# md5sum /dev/rbd0 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 9a47797a07fee3a3d71316e22891d752 /dev/rbd0 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@ix-s2:~# md5sum /dev/rbd1 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> e450f50b9ffa0073fae940ee858a43ce /dev/rbd1 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Ok, now i protect snap and create clone... but > same > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> thing... > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> md5 for clone same as for snap,, > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd unmap /dev/rbd1 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd snap protect > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd clone > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> cold-storage/test-image > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd map cold-storage/test-image > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# md5sum /dev/rbd1 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> e450f50b9ffa0073fae940ee858a43ce /dev/rbd1 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> .... but it's broken... > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# parted /dev/rbd1 print > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Error: /dev/rbd1: unrecognised disk label > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ========= > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> tech details: > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph -v > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ceph version 0.94.2 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (5fb85614ca8f354284c713a2f9c610860720bbf3) > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> We have 2 inconstistent pgs, but all images not > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> placed > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> on > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> this > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> pgs... > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph health detail > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> HEALTH_ERR 2 pgs inconsistent; 18 scrub errors > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> pg 2.490 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> [56,15,29] > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> pg 2.c4 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> [56,10,42] > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 18 scrub errors > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ============ > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph osd map cold-storage > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> osdmap e16770 pool 'cold-storage' (2) object > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> '0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5' -> pg > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2.74458f70 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (2.770) > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> -> up > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ([37,15,14], p37) acting ([37,15,14], p37) > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph osd map cold-storage > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@snap > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> osdmap e16770 pool 'cold-storage' (2) object > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> '0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@snap' -> pg > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2.793cd4a3 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (2.4a3) > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> -> up > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ([12,23,17], p12) acting ([12,23,17], p12) > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph osd map cold-storage > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@test-image > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> osdmap e16770 pool 'cold-storage' (2) object > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> '0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@test-image' > -> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> pg > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2.9519c2a9 > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (2.2a9) > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> -> up ([12,44,23], p12) acting ([12,44,23], p12) > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Also we use cache layer, which in current moment - > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> in > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> forward > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> mode... > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Can you please help me with this.. As my brain > stop > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> to > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> understand > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> what is > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> going on... > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Thank in advance! > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ceph-users mailing list > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <javascript:;> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> -- > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> Andrija Panić > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> ceph-users mailing list > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <javascript:;> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >> > >> >> > > > > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com