Hello, On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:46:55 +0100 (BST) Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> I've done the ceph osd reweight-by-utilization and it seems to have > solved the issue. However, not sure if this will be the long term > solution. > No. As I said in my reply, use "crush reweight" to permanently adjust weights. reweight-by-utilization is a band-aid and not permanent, see: http://cephnotes.ksperis.com/blog/2014/12/23/difference-between-ceph-osd-reweight-and-ceph-osd-crush-reweight More OSDs may or may not result in a better uniformity, the 30% difference you're seeing is definitely at the far end of what one would expect with Ceph. Christian > Thanks for your help > > Andrei > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Shinobu Kinjo" <shinobu...@gmail.com> > > To: "Andrei Mikhailovsky" <and...@arhont.com> > > Cc: "Christian Balzer" <ch...@gol.com>, "ceph-users" > > <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> Sent: Friday, 8 April, 2016 01:35:18 > > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] rebalance near full osd > > > There was a discussion before regarding to the situation where you are > > facing now. [1] > > Would you have a look, if it's helpful or not for you. > > > > [1] > > http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2016-February/007622.html > > > > Cheers, > > Shinobu > -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer ch...@gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications http://www.gol.com/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
