On 06/04/2016 06:12 PM, Nick Fisk wrote:
Yes, this is fine. I currently use 2 bonded 10G nics which have the untagged vlan as the public network and a tagged vlan as the cluster network.
Thanks for info!
However, when I build my next cluster I will probably forgo the separate cluster network and just run them over the same IP, as after running the cluster, I don't see any benefit from separate networks when taking into account the extra complexity. Something to consider.
Well, i was thinking to reduce the internal chatter just to specified vlan.. OTOH all nodes will stay on the same switch so i am not sure if it's worth it.. Thank you! Adrian
-----Original Message----- From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of Adrian Sevcenco Sent: 04 June 2016 16:11 To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Subject: [ceph-users] 2 networks vs 2 NICs Hi! I seen in discussion and in documentation that "networks" is used interchangeable with "NIC" (which also is a different thing than interface) .. So, my question is :for an OSD server with 24 OSDs with a single 40 GB NIC would be ok to have a public network on the main interface and a vlan (virtual) interface for the cluster network? Thank you! Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
