On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Alex Gorbachev <a...@iss-integration.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Василий Ангапов <anga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Guys, >> >> This bug is hitting me constantly, may be once per several days. Does >> anyone know is there a solution already? > > > I see there is a fix available, and am waiting for a backport to a > longterm kernel: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/12/919 > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/12/297 > > -- > Alex Gorbachev > Storcium
No more issues on the latest kernel builds. Alex > > > > >> >> 2016-07-05 11:47 GMT+03:00 Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk>: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of >>>> Alex Gorbachev >>>> Sent: 04 July 2016 20:50 >>>> To: Campbell Steven <caste...@gmail.com> >>>> Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>; Tim Bishop <tim- >>>> li...@bishnet.net> >>>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Is anyone seeing iissues with >>>> task_numa_find_cpu? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Campbell Steven <caste...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Hi Alex/Stefan, >>>> > >>>> > I'm in the middle of testing 4.7rc5 on our test cluster to confirm >>>> > once and for all this particular issue has been completely resolved by >>>> > Peter's recent patch to sched/fair.c refereed to by Stefan above. For >>>> > us anyway the patches that Stefan applied did not solve the issue and >>>> > neither did any 4.5.x or 4.6.x released kernel thus far, hopefully it >>>> > does the trick for you. We could get about 4 hours uptime before >>>> > things went haywire for us. >>>> > >>>> > It's interesting how it seems the CEPH workload triggers this bug so >>>> > well as it's quite a long standing issue that's only just been >>>> > resolved, another user chimed in on the lkml thread a couple of days >>>> > ago as well and again his trace had ceph-osd in it as well. >>>> > >>>> > https://lkml.org/lkml/headers/2016/6/21/491 >>>> > >>>> > Campbell >>>> >>>> Campbell, any luck with testing 4.7rc5? rc6 came out just now, and I am >>>> having trouble booting it on an ubuntu box due to some other unrelated >>>> problem. So dropping to kernel 4.2.0 for now, which does not seem to have >>>> this load related problem. >>>> >>>> I looked at the fair.c code in kernel source tree 4.4.14 and it is quite >>> different >>>> than Peter's patch (assuming 4.5.x source), so the patch does not apply >>>> cleanly. Maybe another 4.4.x kernel will get the update. >>> >>> I put in a new 16.04 node yesterday and went straight to 4.7.rc6. It's been >>> backfilling for just under 24 hours now with no drama. Disks are set to use >>> CFQ. >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Alex >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > On 29 June 2016 at 18:29, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG >>>> > <s.pri...@profihost.ag> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Am 29.06.2016 um 04:30 schrieb Alex Gorbachev: >>>> >>> Hi Stefan, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG >>>> >>> <s.pri...@profihost.ag> wrote: >>>> >>>> Please be aware that you may need even more patches. Overall this >>>> >>>> needs 3 patches. Where the first two try to fix a bug and the 3rd >>>> >>>> one fixes the fixes + even more bugs related to the scheduler. I've >>>> >>>> no idea on which patch level Ubuntu is. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Stefan, would you be able to please point to the other two patches >>>> >>> beside https://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2016/6/22/102/1 ? >>>> >> >>>> >> Sorry sure yes: >>>> >> >>>> >> 1. 2b8c41daba32 ("sched/fair: Initiate a new task's util avg to a >>>> >> bounded value") >>>> >> >>>> >> 2.) 40ed9cba24bb7e01cc380a02d3f04065b8afae1d ("sched/fair: Fix >>>> >> post_init_entity_util_avg() serialization") >>>> >> >>>> >> 3.) the one listed at lkml. >>>> >> >>>> >> Stefan >>>> >> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Thank you, >>>> >>> Alex >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Stefan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Excuse my typo sent from my mobile phone. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 28.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Tim Bishop <tim-li...@bishnet.net>: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes - I noticed this today on Ubuntu 16.04 with the default kernel. >>>> >>>> No useful information to add other than it's not just you. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Tim. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:05:40AM -0400, Alex Gorbachev wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> After upgrading to kernel 4.4.13 on Ubuntu, we are seeing a few of >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> these issues where an OSD would fail with the stack below. I >>>> >>>> logged a >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> bug at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121101 and there >>>> >>>> is >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> a similar description at https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/22/102, but >>>> >>>> the >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> odd part is we have turned off CFQ and blk-mq/scsi-mq and are using >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> just the noop scheduler. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Does the ceph kernel code somehow use the fair scheduler code >>>> block? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Alex Gorbachev >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Storcium >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.684974] CPU: 30 PID: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 10403 Comm: ceph-osd Not tainted 4.4.13-040413-generic >>>> >>>> #201606072354 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.684991] Hardware name: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+/X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+, BIOS >>>> 3.2 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 03/04/2015 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685009] task: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ffff880f79df8000 ti: ffff880f79fb8000 task.ti: ffff880f79fb8000 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685024] RIP: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 0010:[<ffffffff810b416e>] [<ffffffff810b416e>] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> task_numa_find_cpu+0x22e/0x6f0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685051] RSP: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 0018:ffff880f79fbb818 EFLAGS: 00010206 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685063] RAX: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880f79fbb8b8 RCX: 0000000000000000 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685076] RDX: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8810352d4800 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685107] RBP: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ffff880f79fbb880 R08: 00000001020cf87c R09: 0000000000ff00ff >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685150] R10: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 0000000000000009 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff8807c3adc4c0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685194] R13: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 0000000000000006 R14: 000000000000033e R15: fffffffffffffec7 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685238] FS: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 00007f30e46b8700(0000) GS:ffff88105f580000(0000) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> knlGS:0000000000000000 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685283] CS: 0010 DS: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685310] CR2: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 000000001321a000 CR3: 0000000853598000 CR4: 00000000000406e0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685354] Stack: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685374] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ffffffff813d050f 000000000000000d 0000000000000045 ffff880f79df8000 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685426] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 000000000000033f 0000000000000000 0000000000016b00 >>>> 000000000000033f >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685477] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ffff880f79df8000 ffff880f79fbb8b8 00000000000001f4 0000000000000054 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685528] Call Trace: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685555] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff813d050f>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x2f/0x40 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685584] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff810b4a6e>] task_numa_migrate+0x43e/0x9b0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685613] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff810b3acc>] ? update_cfs_shares+0xbc/0x100 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685642] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff810b5059>] numa_migrate_preferred+0x79/0x80 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685672] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff810b9b94>] task_numa_fault+0x7f4/0xd40 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685700] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff813d9634>] ? timerqueue_del+0x24/0x70 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685729] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff810b9205>] ? should_numa_migrate_memory+0x55/0x130 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685762] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff811bd590>] handle_mm_fault+0xbc0/0x1820 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685793] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff810edc00>] ? __hrtimer_init+0x90/0x90 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685822] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff810c211d>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x4d/0x60 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685853] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff8121e20a>] ? poll_freewait+0x4a/0xa0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685882] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff8106a537>] __do_page_fault+0x197/0x400 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685910] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff8106a7c2>] do_page_fault+0x22/0x30 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685939] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff8180a878>] page_fault+0x28/0x30 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685967] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff813e4c5f>] ? copy_page_to_iter_iovec+0x5f/0x300 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685997] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff810b2795>] ? select_task_rq_fair+0x625/0x700 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686026] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff813e4f16>] copy_page_to_iter+0x16/0xa0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686056] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff816f02ad>] skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x14d/0x280 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686087] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff8174a503>] tcp_recvmsg+0x613/0xbe0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686117] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff8177844e>] inet_recvmsg+0x7e/0xb0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686146] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff816e0d3b>] sock_recvmsg+0x3b/0x50 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686173] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff816e0f91>] SYSC_recvfrom+0xe1/0x160 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686202] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff810f36f5>] ? ktime_get_ts64+0x45/0xf0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686230] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff816e239e>] SyS_recvfrom+0xe/0x10 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686259] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff818086f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x71 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686287] Code: 55 b0 >>>> >>>> 4c >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 89 f7 e8 53 cd ff ff 48 8b 55 b0 49 8b 4e 78 48 8b 82 d8 01 00 00 >>>> >>>> 48 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 83 c1 01 31 d2 49 0f af 86 b0 00 00 00 4c 8b 73 78 <48> f7 f1 48 8b >>>> >>>> 4b >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 20 49 89 c0 48 29 c1 48 8b 45 d0 4c 03 43 48 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686512] RIP >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [<ffffffff810b416e>] task_numa_find_cpu+0x22e/0x6f0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686544] RSP >>>> >>>> <ffff880f79fbb818> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686896] ---[ end >>>> >>>> trace >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 544cb9f68cb55c93 ]--- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:52:15 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [138246.669713] mpt2sas_cm0: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> log_info(0x30030101): originator(IOP), code(0x03), sub_code(0x0101) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jun 28 09:55:01 roc0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Tim. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Tim Bishop >>>> >>>> http://www.bishnet.net/tim/ >>>> >>>> PGP Key: 0x6C226B37FDF38D55 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>> >>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>>> >>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> ceph-users mailing list >>>> >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>>> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
