Hi with rep_size=2 and min_size=2, what drawbacks are removed compared with rep_size=2 and min_size=1?
thx J. On 23/09/16 10:07, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> Op 23 september 2016 om 10:04 schreef mj <li...@merit.unu.edu>: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> On 09/23/2016 09:41 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote: >>>> If you care about your data you run with size = 3 and min_size = 2. >>>> >>>> Wido >> We're currently running with min_size 1. Can we simply change this, >> online, with: >> >> ceph osd pool set vm-storage min_size 2 >> >> and expect everything to continue running? >> > Yes, it will. No rebalance will happen. min_size = 2 just tells Ceph that 2 > replicas need to be online for I/O (Read and Write) to continue. > > Wido > >> (our cluster is HEALTH_OK, enough disk space, etc, etc) >> >> MJ >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
