So description of Jewel is wrong? http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:27 AM, John Spray <jsp...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <ski...@redhat.com> wrote: >> It may be probably kind of challenge but please consider Kraken (or >> later) because Jewel will be retired: >> >> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/ > > Nope, Jewel is LTS, Kraken is not. > > Kraken will only receive updates until the next stable release. Jewel > will receive updates for longer. > > John > >> >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Shain Miley <smi...@npr.org> wrote: >>> No this is a production cluster that I have not had a chance to upgrade yet. >>> >>> We had an is with the OS on a node so I am just trying to reinstall ceph and >>> hope that the osd data is still in tact. >>> >>> Once I get things stable again I was planning on upgrading…but the upgrade >>> is a bit intensive by the looks of it so I need to set aside a decent amount >>> of time. >>> >>> Thanks all! >>> >>> Shain >>> >>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Vasu Kulkarni <vakul...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Just curious, why you still want to deploy new hammer instead of stable >>> jewel? Is this a test environment? the last .10 release was basically for >>> bug fixes for 0.94.9. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Shinobu Kinjo <ski...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> FYI: >>>> https://plus.google.com/+Cephstorage/posts/HuCaTi7Egg3 >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Shain Miley <smi...@npr.org> wrote: >>>> > Hello, >>>> > I am trying to deploy ceph to a new server using ceph-deply which I have >>>> > done in the past many times without issue. >>>> > >>>> > Right now I am seeing a timeout trying to connect to git.ceph.com: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > [hqosd6][INFO ] Running command: env DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive >>>> > apt-get >>>> > -q install --assume-yes ca-certificates >>>> > [hqosd6][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... >>>> > [hqosd6][DEBUG ] Building dependency tree... >>>> > [hqosd6][DEBUG ] Reading state information... >>>> > [hqosd6][DEBUG ] ca-certificates is already the newest version. >>>> > [hqosd6][DEBUG ] 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not >>>> > upgraded. >>>> > [hqosd6][INFO ] Running command: wget -O release.asc >>>> > https://ceph.com/git/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] --2017-03-15 11:49:16-- >>>> > https://ceph.com/git/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] Resolving ceph.com (ceph.com)... 158.69.68.141 >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] Connecting to ceph.com (ceph.com)|158.69.68.141|:443... >>>> > connected. >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved >>>> > Permanently >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] Location: >>>> > https://git.ceph.com/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>> > [following] >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] --2017-03-15 11:49:17-- >>>> > https://git.ceph.com/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] Resolving git.ceph.com (git.ceph.com)... 8.43.84.132 >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] Connecting to git.ceph.com >>>> > (git.ceph.com)|8.43.84.132|:443... failed: Connection timed out. >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] Retrying. >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] --2017-03-15 11:51:25-- (try: 2) >>>> > https://git.ceph.com/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] Connecting to git.ceph.com >>>> > (git.ceph.com)|8.43.84.132|:443... failed: Connection timed out. >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] Retrying. >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] --2017-03-15 11:53:34-- (try: 3) >>>> > https://git.ceph.com/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] Connecting to git.ceph.com >>>> > (git.ceph.com)|8.43.84.132|:443... failed: Connection timed out. >>>> > [hqosd6][WARNIN] Retrying. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > I am wondering if this is a known issue. >>>> > >>>> > Just an fyi...I am using an older version of ceph-deply (1.5.36) because >>>> > in >>>> > the past upgrading to a newer version I was not able to install hammer >>>> > on >>>> > the cluster…so the workaround was to use a slightly older version. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks in advance for any help you may be able to provide. >>>> > >>>> > Shain >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > ceph-users mailing list >>>> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com