Hi Ben!
Thanks for your advice. I included the names of our gateways, but did omit the external name of the service itself. Now, everything is working again. And yes, this change is worth a note J Best regards, Ingo Von: Ben Hines [mailto:bhi...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Mai 2017 02:16 An: Ingo Reimann Cc: Radoslaw Zarzynski; ceph-users Betreff: Re: [ceph-users] RGW 10.2.5->10.2.7 authentication fail? We used this workaround when upgrading to Kraken (which had a similar issue) >modify the zonegroup and populate the 'hostnames' array with all backend >server hostnames as well as the hostname terminated by haproxy Which i'm fine with. It's definitely a change that should be noted in a more prominent release note. Without the hostname in there, ceph interpreted the hostname as a bucket name if the hostname rgw was being hit with differed from the hostname of the actual server. Pre Kraken, i didn't need that setting at all and it just worked. -Ben On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Ingo Reimann <ireim...@dunkel.de> wrote: Hi Radek, are there any news about this issue? We are also stuck with 10.2.5 and can`t update to 10.2.7. We use a couple of radosgws that are loadbalanced behind a Keepalived/LVS. Removal of rgw_dns_name does only help, if I address the gateway directly, but not in general. Best regards, Ingo -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] Im Auftrag von Radoslaw Zarzynski Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 11:59 An: Łukasz Jagiełło Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com Betreff: Re: [ceph-users] RGW 10.2.5->10.2.7 authentication fail? Hello Łukasz, Thanks for your testing and sorry for my mistake. It looks that two commits need to be reverted to get the previous behaviour: The already mentioned one: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/c9445faf7fac2ccb8a05b53152c0ca16d7f4c6d0 Its dependency: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/b72fc1b820ede3cd186d887d9d30f7f91fe3764b They have been merged in the same pull request: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11760 and form the difference visible between v10.2.5 and v10.2.6 in the matter of "in_hosted_domain" handling: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blame/v10.2.5/src/rgw/rgw_rest.cc#L1773 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blame/v10.2.6/src/rgw/rgw_rest.cc#L1781-L1782 I'm really not sure we want to revert them. Still, it can be that they just unhide a misconfiguration issue while fixing the problems we had with handling of virtual hosted buckets. Regards, Radek On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Łukasz Jagiełło <jagiello.luk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried today revert [1] from 10.2.7 but the problem is still there > even without the change. Revert to 10.2.5 fix the issue instantly. > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/c9445faf7fac2ccb8a05b53152c0ca16d7 > f4c6d0 > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Radoslaw Zarzynski > <rzarzyn...@mirantis.com> wrote: >> Ingo Reimann Teamleiter Technik Dunkel GmbH <https://www.dunkel.de/> Dunkel GmbH Philipp-Reis-Straße 2 65795 Hattersheim Fon: +49 6190 889-100 <tel:%2B49%206190%20889-100> Fax: +49 6190 889-399 <tel:%2B49%206190%20889-399> eMail: supp...@dunkel.de http://www.Dunkel.de/ Amtsgericht Frankfurt/Main HRB: 37971 Geschäftsführer: Axel Dunkel Ust-ID: DE 811622001 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
